Issue 17993: Location: p. 330 Deferred Events - Value of Deferred Events (uml25-ftf)
Source: International Business Machines (Mr. Omar Badreddin, oobahy(at)gmail.com)
Nature: Revision
Severity: Minor
Summary: I think this is also new specification in UML 2.5. If so, it should be added to the summary of new specifications at the beginning of the document.

This is a feature with some value. The question is the following. Does this feature brings more value than the complexity it adds to the specification and the tools that supports UML? My view is that such a feature adds more avoidable complexity to the tools. At the same time, the same behavior can be achieved using the already existing UML features. I would vote against this feature in favor of keeping the specifications less complex

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
September 27, 2012: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
s is issue # 17993

Problem: 14.049

Severity: Minor
Type: Ambiguity
Location: p. 330 Deferred Events
Title: Value of Deferred Events 
I think this is also new specification in UML 2.5. If so, it should be added to the summary of new specifications at the beginning of the document.
 
This is a feature with some value. The question is the following. Does this feature brings more value than the complexity it adds to the specification and the tools that supports UML? My view is that such a feature adds more avoidable complexity to the tools. At the same time, the same behavior can be achieved using the already existing UML features. I would vote against this feature in favor of keeping the specifications less complex
 
Source: Omar Bahy Badreddin
Discussion: 
This is not new in UML 2.5 and has been around for a while. Despite its complexity, I find it useful. 
Michael Jesse Chonoles