Issue 18023: Location: 17.2.3 Semantics Interaction Fragments p 607 (uml25-ftf)
Source: Lockheed Martin (Mr. Lenny Delligatti, lenny_delligatti2(at)omg.org)
Nature: Revision
Severity: Significant
Summary: Title: Reference to “InteractionOperator” should instead say “InteractionOperand”
Description:
current text
An InteractionFragment may either be contained directly in an enclosing Interaction, or may be contained within an InteractionOperator of a CombinedFragment, 

Discussion: 
In that sentence, “InteractionOperator” should be changed to “InteractionOperand.”  The InteractionOperand metaclass has an association end “fragment : InteractionFragment.”  An interaction operator, on the other hand, is simply an attribute of a combined fragment; it has no association with an interaction fragment.

Proposed Resolution: 
 Change “InteractionOperator” to “InteractionOperand” in that sentence.

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
September 27, 2012: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
s is issue # 18023

Problem: 17.003

Severity: Significant
Type: Grammar
Location: 17.2.3 Semantics Interaction Fragments p 607
Title: Reference to .InteractionOperator. should instead say .InteractionOperand.
Description:
current text
An InteractionFragment may either be contained directly in an enclosing Interaction, or may be contained within an InteractionOperator of a CombinedFragment, 
 
Discussion: 
In that sentence, .InteractionOperator. should be changed to .InteractionOperand..  The InteractionOperand metaclass has an association end .fragment : InteractionFragment..  An interaction operator, on the other hand, is simply an attribute of a combined fragment; it has no association with an interaction fragment.
 
Proposed Resolution: 
 Change .InteractionOperator. to .InteractionOperand. in that sentence.
Source: Lenny Delligatti