Issue 18115: Location: Annex C Keywords	P. 778 - Inconsistent metaclass keywords (uml25-ftf)
Source: Oracle (Mr. Dave Hawkins, dave.hawkins(at)oracle.com)
Nature: Revision
Severity: Significant
Summary: There a number of keywords that are used when the same notation is used for multiple metaclasses. These aren't derived from the name of the metaclass in a consistent manner. For example, centralBuffer for CentralBufferNode, deployment spec for DeploymentSpecification, substitute for Substitution.

Stereotypes are now given as their exact name, without transliteration or abbreviation. Should the same approach be used for metaclasses?

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
September 28, 2012: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
s is issue # 18115

Problem: C.048

Severity: Significant
Type: Revision
Location: Annex C Keywords         P. 778
 
Title: Inconsistent metaclass keywords:
Summary:
 
There a number of keywords that are used when the same notation is used for multiple metaclasses. 
These aren't derived from the name of the metaclass in a consistent manner. For example, centralBuffer for CentralBufferNode, deployment spec for DeploymentSpecification, substitute for Substitution.
 
Stereotypes are now given as their exact name, without transliteration or abbreviation. Should the same approach be used for metaclasses?
 
Source: dave.hawkins@oracle.com