Issue 18199: cmplx function is misplaced (vsiplxx-rtf) Source: (Mr. Brooks Moses, brooks.moses(at)dpdx.net) Nature: Revision Severity: Minor Summary: The cmplx() function is placed at the end of section 10.3.5, which is otherwise about "Scalar functions and their element-wise extensions" -- but cmplx() is defined only as an element-wise function, not as a scalar function. It does not belong in this section. In addition, the return value is given as "The element-wise extension of the complex(T1, T2) constructor to views." This is not the return value -- it returns a view, not a constructor! This should be clarified. Resolution: In the interest of closing the current RTF so that the solutions to resolved issues can be made publically available, this issue is deferred to the next RTF. Disposition: Deferred Revised Text: Actions taken: October 23, 2012: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== te: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:40:34 -0700 From: Brooks Moses User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 To: Subject: VSIPL++ issue (#5 from me) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Oct 2012 17:40:35.0489 (UTC) FILETIME=[81F68910:01CDB145] Name: Brooks Moses Employer: Mentor Graphics mailFrom: brooks_moses@mentor.com Terms_Agreement: I agree Specification: VSIPL++ Section: 10.3.5 [math.fns.elementwise] FormalNumber: ptc/2012-07-27 Version: 1.2 - FTF Beta 1 Doc_Year: 2012 Doc_Month: August Doc_Day: 10 Page: 142 Title: cmplx function is misplaced Nature: Bug Severity: Minor B1: Report Issue Description: The cmplx() function is placed at the end of section 10.3.5, which is otherwise about "Scalar functions and their element-wise extensions" -- but cmplx() is defined only as an element-wise function, not as a scalar function. It does not belong in this section. In addition, the return value is given as "The element-wise extension of the complex(T1, T2) constructor to views." This is not the return value -- it returns a view, not a constructor! This should be clarified. - Brooks