Issue 18259: Note on Deferred memory allocation (vsiplxx-rtf)
Source:  (Mr. Andrew Watson, )
Nature: Revision
Severity: Minor
Summary: p48 says "Note to Implementors: memory allocation shall not be deferred." Why not? This is clearly an oblique reference to some unspoken semantics of the interface that isn't documented, and perhaps should be.
Resolution: In the interest of closing the current RTF so that the solutions to resolved issues can be made publically available, this issue is deferred to the next RTF.
Disposition: Deferred
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
November 13, 2012: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 13 Nov 2012 13:14:59 -0500
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Andrew Watson
Employer:        OMG
mailFrom:        andrew@omg.org
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   VSIPL RFC submission
Section:         VSIPL Introduction
FormalNumber:    mars/12-02-06,07,08,09,10
Version:         1.3
Doc_Year:        2012
Doc_Month:       March
Doc_Day:         04
Page:            48 (PDF page 70)
Title:           Note on Deferred memory allocation
Nature:          Revision
Severity:        Minor
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue


Description:

p48 says "Note to Implementors: memory allocation shall not be deferred." Why not? This is clearly an oblique reference to some unspoken semantics of the interface that isn't documented, and perhaps should be.