Issue 18270: Stereotype for extended bound element realization (uml25-ftf) Source: Ivar Jacobson International AB (Mr. Ed Seidewitz, eseidewitz(at)ivarjacobson.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Specification: OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Version 2.5 FTF – Beta 1 (ptc/2012-10-24) Subclause: 7.3.3 UML 2.5 allows the “expanded bound element” for a template bound element to be related to the bound element using a realization. Should there be a standard stereotype to be applied to a realization used in this way? Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: November 20, 2012: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: Ed Seidewitz To: "issues@omg.org" Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:35:55 -0500 Subject: Stereotype for extended bound element realization Thread-Topic: Stereotype for extended bound element realization Thread-Index: Ac3HZm4wgnXP3t2JQTe6GrxHg63UTg== Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US X-Mailprotector-Decision: deliver X-Mailprotector-Connection: TLSv1|[10.1.50.226]|10.1.50.226|outbound.mailprotector.net|0.0|0.0|0|||0|0|0|0 X-Mailprotector-Results: null_ptr clean X-Mailprotector-Score: 40 X-Mailprotector-IP-Analysis: 0, 10.1.50.226, Ugly c=0 p=0 Source New X-Mailprotector-Scan-Diagnostics: 0-0-0-4907-c X-Mailprotector-ID: 469e195b-ec13-4545-8e04-102f924e16eb Specification: OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Version 2.5 FTF . Beta 1 (ptc/2012-10-24) Subclause: 7.3.3 UML 2.5 allows the .expanded bound element. for a template bound element to be related to the bound element using a realization. Should there be a standard stereotype to be applied to a realization used in this way?