Issue 18304: Mapping of Map type underspecified for C (dds-xtypes-rtf)
Source: PrismTech (Mr. Erik Hendriks, erik.hendriks(at)prismtech.com)
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary: Section 7.5.1.3.1 is referring to a C-mapping defined above. However, no C-mapping is mentioned so far, or it should refer to section 7.5.1.3.3
Section 7.5.1.3.3 seems to suggest the C-mapping should be done as in section 7.4.1.1.4, which is a sequence of name-value pair structs. I can't imagine that this is a serious mapping proposal, but if it is is should be clearly specified as such
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
December 12, 2012: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 12 Dec 2012 08:26:50 -0500
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Erik Hendriks
Employer:        PrismTech
mailFrom:        erik.hendriks@prismtech,com
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   Extensible and Dynamic Topic Types for DDS
Section:         7.5.1.3.1
FormalNumber:    ptc/2012-03-26
Version:         1.0
Doc_Year:        2012
Doc_Month:       February
Doc_Day:         Day
Page:            115
Title:           Mapping of Map type underspecified for C
Nature:          Clarification
Severity:        Minor
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue


Description:


Section 7.5.1.3.1 is referring to a C-mapping defined above. However, no C-mapping is mentioned so far, or it should refer to section 7.5.1.3.3
Section 7.5.1.3.3 seems to suggest the C-mapping should be done as in section 7.4.1.1.4, which is a sequence of name-value pair structs. I can't imagine that this is a serious mapping proposal, but if it is is should be clearly specified as such