Issue 18421: RequestOffered.requestedOfferedContract() semantic should be removed (dds-psm-java-rtf)
Source: ADLINK Technology Ltd (Mr. Julien Enoch, julien.enoch(at)adlinktech.com)
Nature: Enhancement
Severity: Significant
Summary: Instead of providing the requestedOfferedContract() method for RxO comparison, the inherited Compare implementation should follow the RxO rules.


For instance: Deadline(2) > Deadline(5)
This change simplify the API and avoids the creation of temporary object when trying to evaluate RxO. Notice that, in this case, the natural ordering is still available via the Duration type.
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
February 6, 2013: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 06 Feb 2013 05:14:06 -0500
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Julien Enoch
Employer:        PrismTech
mailFrom:        julien.enoch@prismtech.com
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   Java 5 DDS PSM
Section:         N/A
FormalNumber:    ptc/12-12-04
Version:         1.0
Doc_Year:        Year
Doc_Month:       Month
Doc_Day:         Day
Page:            0
Title:           RequestOffered.requestedOfferedContract() semantic should be removed
Nature:          Enhancement
Severity:        Significant
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue


Description:


Instead of providing the requestedOfferedContract() method for RxO comparison, the inherited Compare implementation should follow the RxO rules.


For instance: Deadline(2) > Deadline(5)
This change simplify the API and avoids the creation of temporary object when trying to evaluate RxO. Notice that, in this case, the natural ordering is still available via the Duration type.