Issue 18460: Allocation tabular notation normative? (sysml-rtf)
Source: NIST (Dr. Conrad Bock, conrad.bock(at)nist.gov)
Nature: Revision
Severity: Minor
Summary: The clause Allocations, Usage Example, Tabular Representation is in the normative part of the spec, but refers to a tabular notation in Annex C, which isn't normative.  Is the tabular notation normative?
Resolution: Defer

Postponed to the next RTF
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
February 15, 2013: received issue
January 3, 2017: Deferred
April 6, 2017: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 15 Feb 2013 11:25:28 -0500
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Conrad Bock
Employer:        NIST
mailFrom:        conrad.bock@nist.gov
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   Systems Modeling Language
Section:         Allocations
FormalNumber:    /formal/12-06-01
Version:         1.3
Doc_Year:        2012
Doc_Month:       June
Doc_Day:         01
Page:             
Title:           Allocation tabular notation normative?
Nature:          Revision
Severity:        Minor
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue


Description:

The clause Allocations, Usage Example, Tabular Representation is in the normative part of the spec, but refers to a tabular notation in Annex C, which isn't normative.  Is the tabular notation normative?