Issue 18467: [UML 2.5] Redundancy in the definition of use case extensions (uml25-ftf)
Source: EADS (Mr. Yves Bernard, yves.bernard(at)airbus.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: As pointed out by Pete in issue #7793, there is a redundancy between ExtensionPoint::useCase and Extend::extendedCase since the later can be derived from the use case owning the ExtensionPoint. It should be specified as such.

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
February 21, 2013: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
te: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:54:36 +0100
Subject: [UML 2.5] Redundancy in the definition of use case extensions 
Thread-Topic: [UML 2.5] Redundancy in the definition of use case extensions 
Thread-Index: Ac4QKjiz1a3ZTUilRvyKuE3G4fbuoQ==
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org


Hi Juergen,
 
Would you create a new issue with the following description:
 
As pointed out by Pete in issue #7793, there is a redundancy between ExtensionPoint::useCase and Extend::extendedCase since the later can be derived from the use case owning the ExtensionPoint. It should be specified as such.
 
Thanks,
 
Yves
 
 
 
The information in this e-mail is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Airbus immediately and delete this e-mail.
Airbus cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this e-mail as it has been sent over public networks. If you have any concerns over the content of this message or its Accuracy or Integrity, please contact Airbus immediately.
All outgoing e-mails from Airbus are checked using regularly updated virus scanning software but you should take whatever measures you deem to be appropriate to ensure that this message and any attachments are virus free.