Issue 1849:  Use of get_txcontext (ots-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature:  Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Summary: is the effect of suspens followed by resume required to be the same as
 never having called suspend in the first place? This isn"t a problem for
 top-level transactions, but may be for subtransactions since the only reference
 suspend returns is to the current transaction and not the entire hierarchy. We
 could allow for get_txcontext to be used in such a case.
 

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
August 24, 1998: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
Return-Path: <M.C.Little@newcastle.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 12:05:57 +0100
From: Mark Little <M.C.Little@newcastle.ac.uk>
Organization: Newcastle University
To: issues@omg.org, ots-rtf@omg.org
Subject: further issues for OTS RTF

Here are some more issues which I've come across while implementing
the OTS. In
no particular order:



(ii) is the effect of suspens followed by resume required to be the
same as
never having called suspend in the first place? This isn't a problem
for
top-level transactions, but may be for subtransactions since the only
reference
suspend returns is to the current transaction and not the entire
hierarchy. We
could allow for get_txcontext to be used in such a case.