Issue 18503: Diagram show inconsistent data (sysml-rtf) Source: PTC (Mr. Phillip Astle, nobody) Nature: Clarification Severity: Significant Summary: Diagrams C.35, C.36 and C.37 show inconsistent allocation between the displayed items, yet the text would seem to imply that they're supposed to show the same relationships. In C.35, the allocation is from an ObjectNode symbol called "DriveCurrent" (which I believe equates to an ObjectFlow - name unknown) to an ItemFlow called "i1". In C.36, the allocation is from an ObjectNode called "DriveCurrent" to a Connector (name unknown). In C.37, the allocation is from an ObjectFlow called "o6" to a Connector called "epc-emg.1". There are a number of issues: 1. ObjectNode is an abstract specialization of ActivityNode and as such you can't have any instances of them in a model. Any reference to an ObjectNode should be removed. 2. The allocation should consistently be from ObjectFlow "o6" to either ItemFlow "i1" or Connector "epc-emg.1". 3. In order to make it clear that the same items are being related, the names of the ObjectFlow and the Connector/ItemFlow should be shown on all diagrams. Currently the ObjectFlow and the Connector names are not shown. Resolution: Defer Postponed to the next RTF Revised Text: Actions taken: February 26, 2013: received issue January 3, 2017: Deferred April 6, 2017: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 26 Feb 2013 09:02:42 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report ******************************************************************************* Name: Phil Astle Employer: Atego mailFrom: phil.astle@atego.com Terms_Agreement: I agree Specification: OMG Systems Modeling Language (OMG SysML.) Section: C.4.8 Defining, Decomposing,and Allocating Activities FormalNumber: formal/2012-06-01 Version: 1.3 Doc_Year: 2012 Doc_Month: June Doc_Day: Day Page: 209 & 210 Title: Diagram show inconsistent data. Nature: Clarification Severity: Significant CODE: 3TMw8 B1: Report Issue Description: Diagrams C.35, C.36 and C.37 show inconsistent allocation between the displayed items, yet the text would seem to imply that they're supposed to show the same relationships. In C.35, the allocation is from an ObjectNode symbol called "DriveCurrent" (which I believe equates to an ObjectFlow - name unknown) to an ItemFlow called "i1". In C.36, the allocation is from an ObjectNode called "DriveCurrent" to a Connector (name unknown). In C.37, the allocation is from an ObjectFlow called "o6" to a Connector called "epc-emg.1". There are a number of issues: 1. ObjectNode is an abstract specialization of ActivityNode and as such you can't have any instances of them in a model. Any reference to an ObjectNode should be removed. 2. The allocation should consistently be from ObjectFlow "o6" to either ItemFlow "i1" or Connector "epc-emg.1". 3. In order to make it clear that the same items are being related, the names of the ObjectFlow and the Connector/ItemFlow should be shown on all diagrams. Currently the ObjectFlow and the Connector names are not shown.