Issue 18546: No Highlight's for implementation values (vsiplxx-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary: I VSIPL before OMG (VSIPL 1.3) some items were highlighted with yellow in the document to indicate implementation dependent values. For instance the vector index (_vi) must be unsigned but need not be long int. Also names used for structures used in incomplete typedefs need not be as shown in the manual although the VSIPL type name is required. The highlight is not in the new manual but the paragraph at the head of the section indicates it.  Need to clarify this for the new specification
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
March 13, 2013: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 13 Mar 2013 11:20:48 -0500
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Randall Judd
Employer:        Retired
mailFrom:        rrjudd@me.com
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   VSIPL
Section:         2.1
FormalNumber:    formal/12-12-01
Version:         1.4
Doc_Year:        2013
Doc_Month:       February
Doc_Day:         07
Page:            7
Title:           No Highlight's for implementation values
Nature:          Clarification
Severity:        Minor
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue


Description:


I VSIPL before OMG (VSIPL 1.3) some items were highlighted with yellow in the document to indicate implementation dependent values. For instance the vector index (_vi) must be unsigned but need not be long int. Also names used for structures used in incomplete typedefs need not be as shown in the manual although the VSIPL type name is required. The highlight is not in the new manual but the paragraph at the head of the section indicates it.  Need to clarify this for the new specification.