Issue 18658: SBVR 1.2] 'level of enforcement' editorial correction (sbvr-rtf) Source: Business Rule Solutions, LLC (Mr. Ron Ross, rross(at)brsolutions.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: In Clause 12.1.3 the preferred term for enforcement of a behavioral (operative) business rule is 'level of enforcement'. This concept is used only in examples in the specification - SBVR itself contains no behavioral business rules. In some examples (including the one in Clause 12.1.3) the older term 'Enforcement Level' is used. 'Enforcement Level' is not defined as a synonym for 'level of enforcement'. An editorial correction is needed to replace each occurrence of 'Enforcement Level' with 'level of enforcement'. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: April 12, 2013: received issue Discussion: I've used "enforcement level" for many years in the Business Rule Concepts book, including the 4th edition out just this month. I'll be quite surprised if anyone doesn't consider "enforcement level" and "level of enforcement" to be synonyms(?). Thanks, Ron End of Annotations:===== hoo-Newman-Id: 362852.65507.bm@smtp120.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: S6g0Q0EVM1ne8hSZx2EvKL1HTWf0P6ZQAzeQrJab0INPjb2 nZHUTA21LPma7Nw.tuNFPnTkyCfQ4Yc6EETdQOcT0PjmxIYdZ2MmYSfuo4kx SJM13gSAvEnpqLKS1F.3gaVyA7xC0L6gtniLoRROCnj..0x_IsuQ8jbN1WMK V_JzlOxQQDm_R47OJzxUIzlM1GKm6xSlxScZHnJapACbaVRyHredlM9XKWqL 3skGyrl0sDS_wGFj8CCEtPBPngMoAHgrwrzRMitbMbYQqTwPybSBaKHkH5B5 yEKaDtdeM6iecWzoTJrsZzW9.DCtknpRcZT8mGvgkvoKEqLDM6txxFQGIKz8 L.VvWLyL1kQCl_Icz26bdzyTJJLvrJB6MvBDB_WJiu2.rcWjVKu1Su8RbQGb PmhURMosrFuRp4vKbD_ceitwBohZcAcVlTB2djf4ALOYkVcMbQ8W3.bLVxvG Qur_VLAOcEcGyDNeouMUBakq1PXwXbNKKv_xL4YokpO1TH4uW38WOLjat4ng H34NSxP8pPunDjOjjYocCixQbnSKXFhZjltiNu_rFKeKatVT8IBCUPboJTDM kyvmTndIfBzv7iZSVZ9e35Ao5xxhtXSmenNwEg6RCGBej1G5l.7FfZe6fexD hBbxoJZsLV74ysHx5XhjHDouxUyDFhCZglsQhXc8yiRj7lhI3aAp6CrKOF_K zGjHvG3ghXORuvDUyLf1IQQ6wphWPnlug6_GyCETOyrhWrhzyxD4Ne91P9yZ BSeHP8jIDajIkEptKLQ-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: MhfrpU2swBDLgYiYhNQDHBu0cE4o.vu2We1FRN9o X-Rocket-Received: from Owner-PC.att.net (rross@109.174.139.135 with login) by smtp120.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Apr 2013 15:56:28 +0000 UTC X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:56:19 -0500 To: Juergen Boldt , Donald Chapin , "'John Hall'" , "'SBVR RTF'" From: "Ronald G. Ross" Subject: RE: [SBVR 1.2] 'level of enforcement' editorial correction - not an issue X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAxh9bvkdeRpsHXpE9w== X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Juergen, Please 'back on' again. You can create an issue for it in my name. I've used "enforcement level" for many years in the Business Rule Concepts book, including the 4th edition out just this month. I'll be quite surprised if anyone doesn't consider "enforcement level" and "level of enforcement" to be synonyms(?). Thanks, Ron At 10:26 AM 4/12/2013, Juergen Boldt wrote: okay then....backing off :-) -Juergen At 11:25 AM 4/12/2013, Donald Chapin wrote: Juergen, What John put in is a legitimate editing correction. OMG and ISO specifications follow the practice of using the preferred term consistently through the specification. Thatâs all Johnâs editing correction does. If someone wants to have a synonym for the preferred term,. Level of Enforcement, then an Issue is the right approach. Donald From: Juergen Boldt [ mailto:juergen@omg.org] Sent: 12 April 2013 14:39 To: Ronald G. Ross; John Hall; SBVR RTF Cc: Donald Chapin Subject: Re: [SBVR 1.2] 'level of enforcement' editorial correction - not an issue sounds like I should file as an issue..? -Juergen At 09:33 AM 4/12/2013, Ronald G. Ross wrote: John, Would it be better to make the two terms synonyms? Surely they would mean the same(?). Is there some discussion I am forgetting? Ron At 04:31 AM 4/12/2013, John Hall wrote: Hi Juergen, Just a note of an editorial correction. Please don't log as an issue. In Clause 12.1.3 the preferred term for enforcement of a behavioral (operative) business rule is 'level of enforcement'. This concept is used only in examples in the specification - SBVR itself contains no behavioral business rules. In some examples (including the one in Clause 12.1.3) the older term 'Enforcement Level' is used. 'Enforcement Level' is not defined as a synonym for 'level of enforcement'. An editorial correction is needed to replace each occurrence of 'Enforcement Level' with 'level of enforcement'. Regards, John [Ronald G. Ross Contact Information] http://www.brsolutions.com/email/wordpress-2.png Blog || http://www.RonRoss.info/blog/ http://www.brsolutions.com/email/linkedin.png LinkedIn || http://www.linkedin.com/pub/ronald-ross/1/3b/346 http://www.brsolutions.com/email/twitter.png Twitter || https://twitter.com/Ronald_G_Ross http://www.brsolutions.com/email/button-green.png Homepage || http://www.RonRoss.info Juergen Boldt Director, Member Services 109 Highland Ave Needham, MA 02494 USA Tel: 781 444 0404 x 132 fax: 781 444 0320 www.omg.org [] Juergen Boldt Director, Member Services 109 Highland Ave Needham, MA 02494 USA Tel: 781 444 0404 x 132 fax: 781 444 0320 www.omg.org [] [Ronald G. Ross Contact Information] http://www.brsolutions.com/email/wordpress-2.png Blog || http://www.RonRoss.info/blog/ http://www.brsolutions.com/email/linkedin.png LinkedIn || http://www.linkedin.com/pub/ronald-ross/1/3b/346 http://www.brsolutions.com/email/twitter.png Twitter || https://twitter.com/Ronald_G_Ross http://www.brsolutions.com/email/button-green.png Homepage || http://www.RonRoss.info X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.254.181;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:DBXPRD0711HT004.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -11 X-BigFish: PS-11(z21cR551bizc89bh936eIdbeeh10e3Ic857hzz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz1b1984h17326ah18c673h8275bh1b9c21h8275dhz2dh54h49h2a8h668h839hd24he5bhf0ah10d2h1249h1288h12a5h12bdh137ah139eh1441h1537h162dh1631h1758h17f1h1898h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1bceh1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh34h1155h) Reply-To: From: Donald Chapin To: "sbvr-rtf " Subject: FW: issue 18524 -- SBVR RTF issue Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 16:53:35 +0100 Organization: Business Semantics Ltd X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQMbkNdo//anLpkb3x2q9vLNdaCJbpZXeANQ X-Originating-IP: [157.56.253.181] X-FOPE-CRA-SourceIpAddress: 157.56.254.181 X-FOPE-CRA-DRYRUN: 1207119;1 X-FOPE-BFA-SENDER: donald.chapin@btconnect.com X-FOPE-BFA-RECEIVER: sbvr-rtf@omg.org X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== All . Attached is the resolution for SBVR Issue 18524 which is an edit correction that was inadvertently mode into an Issue. This Issue Resolution is ready for ballot. Donald From: Juergen Boldt [mailto:juergen@omg.org] Sent: 04 March 2013 16:40 To: issues@omg.org; sbvr-rtf@omg.org Subject: issue 18524 -- SBVR RTF issue X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-03-01_01:2013-02-28,2013-03-01,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=1 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1212290000 definitions=main-1302280354 From: keri Subject: SBVR 1.1 typos - p. 100 (logics modality table) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 21:10:59 -1000 Cc: sbvr-rtf@omg.org To: Donald R Chapin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAx0ZyZEdGc9pHRm/Jw== X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Donald, I spotted some typos in the logics table on p. 100 (PDF p. 114) of the SBVR 1.1 Convenience draft. Attached is an annotated screenshot of the errors. To summarize, the errors are in column 3 of the deontic section: the bold, capital letters need to be in italics (to match the legend on the following page, as well as the other places where these symbols appear). the small 'p' needs to be in italics (to match the legend on the following page, as well as the other places where this symbol appears). ~ Keri [] Issue 18524 - Edit Corrections in Logics Modality Table.doc Issue 18524 - Edit Corrections in Logics Modality Table.doc X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.249.69;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:AMSPRD0210HT004.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -13 X-BigFish: PS-13(z21cR551bizc89bhe6eIdbeeh542Ic857h12d5I4015Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz17326ah18c673h1954cbh18602eh8275bh8275dhz2dh2a8h668h839hd24he5bhf0ah1249h1288h12a5h12bdh137ah139eh1441h1504h1537h162dh1631h1758h17f1h1898h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1bceh1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh34h1155h) From: Donald Chapin To: "sbvr-rtf " Subject: FW: issue 18658 -- SBVR RTF issue Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 16:11:32 +0100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQEph/ePJG6oSGeCVzcTLGpdsrt3UJo9EBCg X-Originating-IP: [157.56.250.181] X-OriginatorOrg: businesssemantics.com X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== All -- Attached is the resolution for SBVR Issue 18658, which replaces the non-used preferred term "level of enforcement" with "enforcement level" to be consistent with the Business Motivation Model and usage elsewhere in the SBVR specification. The Issue Resolution is ready for ballot. Donald -----Original Message----- From: Juergen Boldt [mailto:juergen@omg.org] Sent: 12 April 2013 18:40 To: issues@omg.org; sbvr-rtf@omg.org Subject: issue 18658 -- SBVR RTF issue This is issue # 18658 SBVR 1.2] 'level of enforcement' editorial correction In Clause 12.1.3 the preferred term for enforcement of a behavioral (operative) business rule is 'level of enforcement'. This concept is used only in examples in the specification - SBVR itself contains no behavioral business rules. In some examples (including the one in Clause 12.1.3) the older term 'Enforcement Level' is used. 'Enforcement Level' is not defined as a synonym for 'level of enforcement'. An editorial correction is needed to replace each occurrence of 'Enforcement Level' with 'level of enforcement'. Discussion: I've used "enforcement level" for many years in the Business Rule Concepts book, including the 4th edition out just this month. I'll be quite surprised if anyone doesn't consider "enforcement level" and "level of enforcement" to be synonyms(?). Thanks, Ron Juergen Boldt Director, Member Services 109 Highland Ave Needham, MA 02494 USA Tel: 781 444 0404 x 132 fax: 781 444 0320 www.omg.org [] Issue 18658 - Level of Enforcement vs. Enforcement Level.doc Issue 18658 - Level of Enforcement vs. Enforcement Level.doc X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8626,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-05-03_06:2013-05-03,2013-05-03,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1302030000 definitions=main-1305030137 Subject: Re: issue 18658 -- SBVR RTF issue From: keri Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 05:55:25 -1000 Cc: sbvr-rtf To: Donald Chapin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAh15Qr0dek/V X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Donald, Ron, This calls for a diagram change as well. ~ Keri On May 3, 2013, at 5:11 AM, Donald Chapin wrote: All -- Attached is the resolution for SBVR Issue 18658, which replaces the non-used preferred term "level of enforcement" with "enforcement level" to be consistent with the Business Motivation Model and usage elsewhere in the SBVR specification. The Issue Resolution is ready for ballot. Donald -----Original Message----- From: Juergen Boldt [mailto:juergen@omg.org] Sent: 12 April 2013 18:40 To: issues@omg.org; sbvr-rtf@omg.org Subject: issue 18658 -- SBVR RTF issue This is issue # 18658 SBVR 1.2] 'level of enforcement' editorial correction In Clause 12.1.3 the preferred term for enforcement of a behavioral (operative) business rule is 'level of enforcement'. This concept is used only in examples in the specification - SBVR itself contains no behavioral business rules. In some examples (including the one in Clause 12.1.3) the older term 'Enforcement Level' is used. 'Enforcement Level' is not defined as a synonym for 'level of enforcement'. An editorial correction is needed to replace each occurrence of 'Enforcement Level' with 'level of enforcement'. Discussion: I've used "enforcement level" for many years in the Business Rule Concepts book, including the 4th edition out just this month. I'll be quite surprised if anyone doesn't consider "enforcement level" and "level of enforcement" to be synonyms(?). Thanks, Ron Juergen Boldt Director, Member Services 109 Highland Ave Needham, MA 02494 USA Tel: 781 444 0404 x 132 fax: 781 444 0320 www.omg.org [] X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.253.69;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:DB3PRD0210HT002.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -16 X-BigFish: PS-16(z21cR551biz98dI9371Ie6eI936eIc85fhdbeeh542I12d5I4015Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz17326ah18c673h1954cbh18602eh8275bh8275dhz2dh2a8h668h839hd24he5bhf0ah1249h1288h12a5h12bdh137ah139eh1441h1504h1537h162dh1631h1758h17f1h1898h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1bceh1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh34h1155h) From: Donald Chapin To: "'keri'" , "'sbvr-rtf'" Subject: RE: issue 18658 -- SBVR RTF issue Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 12:36:21 +0100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac5KTeciPi1wf4WVT2WcM//sw3ktjw== X-Originating-IP: [81.149.51.65] X-OriginatorOrg: businesssemantics.com X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== All . Attached is the resolution for SBVR Issue 18658 with the updated diagram added and .level of enforcement. kept as a synonym. This Issue Resolution is ready for ballot. Donald From: keri [mailto:keri_ah@mac.com] Sent: 03 May 2013 16:55 To: Donald Chapin Cc: sbvr-rtf Subject: Re: issue 18658 -- SBVR RTF issue Donald, Ron, This calls for a diagram change as well. ~ Keri On May 3, 2013, at 5:11 AM, Donald Chapin wrote: All -- Attached is the resolution for SBVR Issue 18658, which replaces the non-used preferred term "level of enforcement" with "enforcement level" to be consistent with the Business Motivation Model and usage elsewhere in the SBVR specification. The Issue Resolution is ready for ballot. Donald -----Original Message----- From: Juergen Boldt [mailto:juergen@omg.org] Sent: 12 April 2013 18:40 To: issues@omg.org; sbvr-rtf@omg.org Subject: issue 18658 -- SBVR RTF issue This is issue # 18658 SBVR 1.2] 'level of enforcement' editorial correction In Clause 12.1.3 the preferred term for enforcement of a behavioral (operative) business rule is 'level of enforcement'. This concept is used only in examples in the specification - SBVR itself contains no behavioral business rules. In some examples (including the one in Clause 12.1.3) the older term 'Enforcement Level' is used. 'Enforcement Level' is not defined as a synonym for 'level of enforcement'. An editorial correction is needed to replace each occurrence of 'Enforcement Level' with 'level of enforcement'. Discussion: I've used "enforcement level" for many years in the Business Rule Concepts book, including the 4th edition out just this month. I'll be quite surprised if anyone doesn't consider "enforcement level" and "level of enforcement" to be synonyms(?). Thanks, Ron Juergen Boldt Director, Member Services 109 Highland Ave Needham, MA 02494 USA Tel: 781 444 0404 x 132 fax: 781 444 0320 www.omg.org [] Content-Type: application/msword; name="Issue 18658 - Level of Enforcement" vs. Enforcement Level (2013-05-06).doc" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Issue 18658 - Level of Enforcement" vs. Enforcement Level (2013-05-06).doc" Issue 18658 - Level of Enforcement.doc Issue 18658 - Level of Enforcement.doc