Issue 18675: MarkedElement should be abstract in provided CMOF files (dd-rtf)
Source: Fraunhofer FOKUS (Mr. Max Bureck, max.bureck(at)fokus.fraunhofer.de)
Nature: Enhancement
Severity: Minor
Summary: In the standard the description of MarkedElement states "It is an abstract super class of all graphical elements whose vertices are explicitly specified and ordered.". However the heading declares "[Class]", which is inconsistent with the naming of other classes. The heading should declare it "[Abstract Class]". And in the CMOF files the MarkedElement is not modeled as an abstract class.
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
April 17, 2013: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 17 Apr 2013 07:39:58 -0400
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAR15Qr0=
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Max Bureck
Employer:        Fraunhofer FOKUS
mailFrom:        max.bureck@fokus.fraunhofer.de
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   Diagram Definition (DD)
Section:         10.3.17
FormalNumber:    formal/2012-07-01
Version:         1.0
Doc_Year:        2012
Doc_Month:       July
Doc_Day:         01
Page:            36
Title:           MarkedElement should be abstract in provided CMOF files
Nature:          Enhancement
Severity:        Minor
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue


Description:


In the standard the description of MarkedElement states "It is an abstract super class of all graphical elements whose vertices are explicitly specified and ordered.". However the heading declares "[Class]", which is inconsistent with the naming of other classes. The heading should declare it "[Abstract Class]". And in the CMOF files the MarkedElement is not modeled as an abstract class.