Issue 18695: parts should be allowed to show their interfaces (uml25-ftf)
Source: oose Innovative Informatik GmbH (Mr. Axel Scheithauer, axel.scheithauer(at)oose.de)
Nature: Enhancement
Severity: Minor
Summary: The specification allows ports on parts to also show the interfaces of the type of the port:


page 202: "Lollipop and socket symbols may optionally be shown to indicate the provided and required interfaces of the Port, using the same notation as for the Port’s definition."


The same thing is not allowed for parts. While it might be not all that important for parts, it makes the notation incoherent. 


Proposed Resolution:
Add following sentence:


"Lollipop and socket symbols may optionally be shown to indicate the provided and required interfaces of the Part, using the same notation as for the Part’s definition."
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
May 3, 2013: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 03 May 2013 14:04:18 -0400
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Axel Scheithauer
Employer:        oose Innovative Informatik GmbH
mailFrom:        axel.scheithauer@oose.de
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   UML 2.5
Section:         11.2.4
FormalNumber:    ptc/2012-10-24
Version:         2.5 FTF- Beta 1
Doc_Year:        2012
Doc_Month:       October
Doc_Day:         01
Page:            202
Title:           parts should be allowed to show their interfaces
Nature:          Enhancement
Severity:        Minor
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue


Description:


The specification allows ports on parts to also show the interfaces of the type of the port:


page 202: "Lollipop and socket symbols may optionally be shown to indicate the provided and required interfaces of the Port, using the same notation as for the Port.s definition."


The same thing is not allowed for parts. While it might be not all that important for parts, it makes the notation incoherent. 


Proposed Resolution:
Add following sentence:


"Lollipop and socket symbols may optionally be shown to indicate the provided and required interfaces of the Part, using the same notation as for the Part.s definition."