Issue 18707: SysML ISO-80000-1 libraries need update per 18269, 18435 and 18681 (sysml-rtf) Source: NASA (Dr. Nicolas F. Rouquette, nicolas.f.rouquette(at)jpl.nasa.gov) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: The ISO-80000-1 libraries need to be updated according to the resolutions of issues 18269, 18435 and 18681 in SysML 1.4 ballots 4 and 5. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: May 11, 2013: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: "Rouquette, Nicolas F (313K)" To: "issues@omg.org" CC: "sysml-rtf@omg.org" Subject: SysML ISO-80000-1 libraries need update per 18269, 18435 and 18681 Thread-Topic: SysML ISO-80000-1 libraries need update per 18269, 18435 and 18681 Thread-Index: AQHOTnemEJ22ZWBOpEmkLBm+8czbVw== Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 18:45:04 +0000 Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010 x-originating-ip: [128.149.137.114] X-Source-Sender: nicolas.f.rouquette@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== The ISO-80000-1 libraries need to be updated according to the resolutions of issues 18269, 18435 and 18681 in SysML 1.4 ballots 4 and 5. - Nicolas. From: "Chonoles, Michael J" To: "Chonoles, Michael J" , "sysml-rtf@omg.org" CC: "Watson, John" Subject: Ballot 6 , 18707 View/Viewpoint Thread-Topic: Ballot 6 , 18707 View/Viewpoint Thread-Index: Ac5l8VTnrTUGwsEYRpe4mSh/z8oC/g== Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:44:07 +0000 Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [158.186.156.82] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8626,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-06-10_03:2013-06-10,2013-06-10,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by amethyst.omg.org id r5AFj5Me000674 Spelling error in "belOfFieldQuantities : LinearConversionUnit" I believe that the description field should have ration-->ratio Thanks Michael -----Original Message----- From: Chonoles, Michael J [mailto:listmanager@omg.org] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 11:21 AM To: sysml-rtf@omg.org Cc: Watson, John Subject: EXTERNAL: Ballot 6 , 18719 View/Viewpoint Some questions. 1) What was the motivation for preventing View from owning comment elements. Practically, when presenting a view to stakeholders, we want them to be able to place comments (questions, tbd, action items, etc.) on the elements. 2) It is unclear whether a view can reference SysML diagrams/tables. This was unclear previously; it would make sense to make this clear now. 3) In table 7.1 the replacement row for Viewpoint has room for only 1 stakeholder. However, the definition for Viewpoint in Section 7.3.2 allows for multiple stakeholders. 4) I'm not sure why a view can only conform to one viewpoint. I have many circumstances, where there is view (such as a particular Requirements Deliverable) that must conform to 1) Requirements Deliverables, 2) Project X artifacts, 3) Classified Artifacts (and perhaps more). 5) Won't some of the figures, such as Figuer c.3, need to change based on this change Michael -----Original Message----- From: Bock, Conrad [mailto:conrad.bock@nist.gov] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 9:56 AM To: sysml-rtf@omg.org Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: Ballot 6 checkin, 17584, OCL P.S. Just wanted to check if the OCL knowledgeable see any problems with this on Parameter: inv: (type.isKindOf(DataType)) implies (effect = null) I heard maybe the type should be checked for having a value when applying isKindOf, but if having no type causes the antecedent to be false, then it would be doing the right thing. Conrad