Issue 18754: Event pools for passive objects (uml25-ftf) Source: Simula Research Laboratory (Mr. Bran Selic, selic(at)acm.org) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: There does not seem to be any constraint that prevents a passive object from owning an event pool. Perhaps this is by design, but, if so, it is not clear how such an event pool is serviced. It looks like this should be clarified or perhaps a constraint preventing passive objects from having event pools should be introduced. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: June 4, 2013: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== M-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=fCQzdcTOUgM98SxlKlFvb8RseRHfzMukkdoZZx1kIwo=; b=lUklpsUVz3diZg9iiOYH7yJqIb3d5iwjHDYgie2kpvd3ANU8SZNQX89oF80pCdHUSj 0fDjH86fsbZsgXOuPimGKmneGBHs/H3w/KqXNzOnx6vwA1eFQ4pgvDtAmJVKP76rJk5K BHKoyVo3wW6s+hXfq5rfGcEDSa77zKybItjI+yyqj/Nz9f+6Jox4dGr6k/WlGi6qdrq1 VlaQbTXiRATEalMGGc7Ka6HARnjG3zWC3vPBFJoWcUWu79FyDIf+KyfE2OU05yXrSloH h0GoNzvHAwbmfaF3fFohbLnuWm379zYCUcmlm8IZta8Oy7HWggbb3yJxfJv7IUUhbAAZ rIUA== X-Received: by 10.58.15.193 with SMTP id z1mr19327424vec.40.1370367586785; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 10:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: bran.selic@gmail.com From: Bran Selic Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 13:39:06 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: DqMqz3_zB22txTrbAAYyYRdoJRc Subject: Three UML 2.5 issues To: "issues@omg.org" Cc: "uml25-ftf@omg.org" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org This message contains three separate issues related to UML 2.5 Common Behaviors: Event pools for passive objects? There does not seem to be any constraint that prevents a passive object from owning an event pool. Perhaps this is by design, but, if so, it is not clear how such an event pool is serviced. It looks like this should be clarified or perhaps a constraint preventing passive objects from having event pools should be introduced.