Issue 18861: RDFWeb serves no purpose (odm-rtf) Source: Adaptive (Mr. Pete Rivett, pete.rivett(at)adaptive.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Recent changes/clarifications in the RDF 1.1 specification reduce the need for a separate RDFWeb package. Further, there has been, and there is unlikely to be, any movement by other standards to use it to “map to similar features in a Common Logic ontology, Topic Map, UML, or ER conceptual model”. Finally, it adds confusion through the existence of duplicated class names with the RDFConcepts package. Therefore the package (section 10.9) should be removed and any metamodel elements merged into RDFConcepts. -- Resolution: A. In section titles for 10.2 thru 10.5, remove “RDFBase Package,” and in titles 10.6 thru 10.8 remove “RDFS Package” and in 10.9 title remove “(RDFWeb Package)” B. Remove the package RDFWeb from the metamodel, merging all of its classes into RDF Concepts (using MOF/UML PackageMerge rules) C. Delete the first 2 paragraphs of section 10.9 D. Retitle Figure 10.9 as “RDF Documents” Revised Text: Actions taken: August 20, 2013: received issue April 25, 2014: closed issue Discussion: This is a useful clean up. While rationalizing headings, there are many mentions to “RDFBase Package” which does not exist: in general the package name actually makes the document hard to navigate so should be removed. End of Annotations:===== iler: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:49:32 -0400 To: issues@omg.org, odm-rtf@omg.org From: Juergen Boldt Subject: issue 18861 -- ODM RTF issue X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org X-Katharion-ID: 1376960123.47929.ams1-mh592 (0.0) Subject: Need issue number ASAP Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:55:21 -0700 X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Need issue number ASAP Thread-Index: Ac6dP/I8TsFQ33wGTeiQez//K9V+AQ== From: "Pete Rivett" To: Cc: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org Hi Juergen We.re trying to complete ODM in the next week and need an issue number for the attached; Elisa, did you ever raise an issue for RDF Source/Dataset . I cannot find it? Thanks Pete X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_003_01CE9AD5.5955A660" Subject: Issue on ODM Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:07:15 -0700 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Issue on ODM Thread-Index: Ac6a1VXqwKGUDsQeQOGmVJgdBsuv6g== From: "Pete Rivett" To: Cc: RDFWeb serves no purpose Recent changes/clarifications in the RDF 1.1 specification reduce the need for a separate RDFWeb package. Further, there has been, and there is unlikely to be, any movement by other standards to use it to .map to similar features in a Common Logic ontology, Topic Map, UML, or ER conceptual model.. Finally, it adds confusion through the existence of duplicated class names with the RDFConcepts package. Therefore the package (section 10.9) should be removed and any metamodel elements merged into RDFConcepts. -- Pete Rivett (pete.rivett@adaptive.com ) CTO, Adaptive Inc 9861 Irvine Center Drive Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92618 cell: +1 949 338 3794 Follow me on Twitter @rivettp or http://twitter.com/rivettp Juergen Boldt Director, Member Services 109 Highland Ave Needham, MA 02494 USA Tel: 781 444 0404 x 132 fax: 781 444 0320 www.omg.org []