Issue 18953: Semantics clarification for removing a value from an out Flow Property (sysml-rtf) Source: Airbus Group (Mr. Yves Bernard, yves.bernard(at)airbus.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: The specification should clarify the semantics from removing a value from an “out” Flow Property. Since “removing” something is considered to be a “write”, can we assume that it is propagated to a connected and matching “in” Flow Property, if any? Resolution: Defer Postponed to the next RTF Revised Text: Actions taken: September 30, 2013: received issue January 3, 2017: Deferred April 6, 2017: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: "BERNARD, Yves" To: "issues@omg.org" CC: "sysml-rtf@omg.org" Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:55:50 +0200 Subject: Semantics clarification for removing a value from an out Flow Property Thread-Topic: Semantics clarification for removing a value from an out Flow Property Thread-Index: Ac694oDUgK3KuCw6RKmIxpgZPEUEzA== Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org Hi Juergen, Would you create a new issue for SysML, please? Description: The specification should clarify the semantics from removing a value from an .out. Flow Property. Since .removing. something is considered to be a .write., can we assume that it is propagated to a connected and matching .in. Flow Property, if any? Thanks, Yves The information in this e-mail is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Airbus immediately and delete this e-mail. Airbus cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this e-mail as it has been sent over public networks. If you have any concerns over the content of this message or its Accuracy or Integrity, please contact Airbus immediately. All outgoing e-mails from Airbus are checked using regularly updated virus scanning software but you should take whatever measures you deem to be appropriate to ensure that this message and any attachments are virus free. X-Trusted-NM: yes Subject: Re: Semantics clarification for removing a value from an out Flow Property From: Nerijus Jankevicius Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:25:20 +0300 Cc: "issues@omg.org" , "sysml-rtf@omg.org" To: "BERNARD, Yves" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org additional question : do primitive flow properties "flow" too? Should primitive flow property value be removed or not? If not, it does not look like "flowing". On Sep 30, 2013, at 4:55 PM, BERNARD, Yves wrote: Hi Juergen, Would you create a new issue for SysML, please? Description: The specification should clarify the semantics from removing a value from an .out. Flow Property. Since .removing. something is considered to be a .write., can we assume that it is propagated to a connected and matching .in. Flow Property, if any? Thanks, Yves The information in this e-mail is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Airbus immediately and delete this e-mail. Airbus cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this e-mail as it has been sent over public networks. If you have any concerns over the content of this message or its Accuracy or Integrity, please contact Airbus immediately. All outgoing e-mails from Airbus are checked using regularly updated virus scanning software but you should take whatever measures you deem to be appropriate to ensure that this message and any attachments are virus free.