Issue 18956: Need to change target of desiredEffect from a state to a new element called effect (updm-2-0-rtf)
Source: International Business Machines (Dr. Graham Bleakley, Ph.D., graham.bleakley(at)uk.ibm.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Desired affect targets "state" in UPDM 2.1, states must have a context and this causes the architects to think too low down in the model (at the OV and SV level) where implementation exists. Desired affect needs to be tied to something in the CV/Stv that is not a "state", called Effect in the CV/StV. 

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
September 26, 2013: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
sclaimed: 56974
To: juergen@omg.org
Subject: please can you raise an issue against UPDM 2.1 called "Need to change
 target of desiredEffect from a state to a new element called effect"
X-KeepSent: B96D1259:81D1E4B1-85257BF2:0061CE38;
 type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: IBM Notes Release 9.0 March 08, 2013
From: Graham Bleakley <graham.bleakley@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:53:38 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D06ML008/06/M/IBM(Release 8.5.3FP2 ZX853FP2HF3|December
 12, 2012) at 26/09/2013 18:53:39,
        Serialize complete at 26/09/2013 18:53:39
X-TM-AS-MML: No
X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER
x-cbid: 13092617-0342-0000-0000-000006651AED
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org


Hi Juergen 
Please can you raise against UPDM 2.1 (for 2.2) 
 "Need to change target of desiredEffect from a state to a new element called effect" 

Desired affect targets "state" in UPDM 2.1, states must have a context and this causes the architects to think too low down in the model (at the OV and SV level) where implementation exists. Desired affect needs to be tied to something in the CV/Stv that is not a "state", called Effect in the CV/StV. 


Thanks in advance 
Graham Bleakley
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
X-Disclaimed: 56974
To: juergen@omg.org
Subject: please can you raise an issue against UPDM 2.1 called "Need to change
 target of desiredEffect from a state to a new element called effect"
X-KeepSent: B96D1259:81D1E4B1-85257BF2:0061CE38;
 type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: IBM Notes Release 9.0 March 08, 2013
From: Graham Bleakley <graham.bleakley@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:53:38 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D06ML008/06/M/IBM(Release 8.5.3FP2 ZX853FP2HF3|December
 12, 2012) at 26/09/2013 18:53:39,
        Serialize complete at 26/09/2013 18:53:39
X-TM-AS-MML: No
X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER
x-cbid: 13092617-0342-0000-0000-000006651AED
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org


Hi Juergen 
Please can you raise against UPDM 2.1 (for 2.2) 
 "Need to change target of desiredEffect from a state to a new element called effect" 

Desired affect targets "state" in UPDM 2.1, states must have a context and this causes the architects to think too low down in the model (at the OV and SV level) where implementation exists. Desired affect needs to be tied to something in the CV/Stv that is not a "state", called Effect in the CV/StV. 


Thanks in advance 
Graham Bleakley
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU