Issue 19092: References to invalid sub clauses (incorrect sub clause numbers) (bpmn2-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: In chapter 2, sub clause 2.1, page 1 it is written that "Process Modeling Conformance type SHALL comply with all of the requirements set forth in sub clause 2.1". However, the requirements are set forth in sub clause 2.2. Also, the sentences after that refer to sub clauses 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 but these should refer to 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5. In short: references to the requirements for the different conformance types should be to 2.2, 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5 and not 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: November 18, 2013: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 18 Nov 2013 08:14:26 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report ******************************************************************************* Name: Steve van den Buys Employer: RealDolmen NV mailFrom: steve.vandenbuys@realdolmen.com Terms_Agreement: I agree Specification: Business Process Model and Notation Section: 2 (Conformance) FormalNumber: formal/2013-09-02 Version: 2.0.1 Doc_Year: 2013 Doc_Month: September Doc_Day: 01 Page: 1 Title: References to invalid sub clauses (incorrect sub clause numbers) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor CODE: 3TMw8 B1: Report Issue Remote Name: 193.41.233.16 Remote User: HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.57 Safari/537.36 Time: 08:14 AM Description: In chapter 2, sub clause 2.1, page 1 it is written that "Process Modeling Conformance type SHALL comply with all of the requirements set forth in sub clause 2.1". However, the requirements are set forth in sub clause 2.2. Also, the sentences after that refer to sub clauses 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 but these should refer to 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5. In short: references to the requirements for the different conformance types should be to 2.2, 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5 and not 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4.