Issue 19168: Class Node should be abstract (odm-rtf)
Source: Institute for Defense Analyses (Dr. Steven Wartik, swartik(at)ida.org)
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary: The Description in Section 10.2.2 states that ReferenceNode, BlankNode, and Literal form a complete and disjoint covering of Node.  That means Node is an abstract class.  For consistency with the «node» stereotype (Section 14.1.3.5), Section 10.2.2 should describe it as such.
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
December 28, 2013: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 28 Dec 2013 11:02:53 -0500
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Steven Wartik
Employer:        Institute for Defense Analyses
mailFrom:        swartik@ida.org
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   Ontology Definition Metamodel
Section:         10.2.2
FormalNumber:    ptc/2013-08-02
Version:         1.1 Beta 1
Doc_Year:        2013
Doc_Month:       November
Doc_Day:         26
Page:            36
Title:           Class Node should be abstract
Nature:          Clarification
Severity:        Minor
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue
Remote Name:     ool-182e78ef.dyn.optonline.net
Remote User:     
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0
Time:            11:02 AM


Description:

The Description in Section 10.2.2 states that ReferenceNode, BlankNode, and Literal form a complete and disjoint covering of Node.  That means Node is an abstract class.  For consistency with the «node» stereotype (Section 14.1.3.5), Section 10.2.2 should describe it as such.