Issue 19183: Incorrect relationship between OWL and RDF packages? (odm-rtf)
Source: Institute for Defense Analyses (Dr. Steven Wartik, swartik(at)ida.org)
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary: Figure 14.19 shows an association labeled "Imports" between packages OWL and RDF. Should it be a dependency stereotyped «import»? That's what the UML specifications describe.
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
January 14, 2014: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 14 Jan 2014 08:47:00 -0500
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Steven Wartik
Employer:        Institute for Defense Analyses
mailFrom:        swartik@ida.org
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   Ontology Definition Metamodel
Section:         14.2.1
FormalNumber:    ptc/2013-08-02
Version:         1.1 Beta 1
Doc_Year:        2013
Doc_Month:       November
Doc_Day:         26
Page:            165
Title:           Incorrect relationship between OWL and RDF packages?
Nature:          Clarification
Severity:        Minor
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue
Remote Name:     129.246.254.178
Remote User:     
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0
Time:            08:47 AM


Description:

Figure 14.19 shows an association labeled "Imports" between packages OWL and RDF. Should it be a dependency stereotyped «import»? That's what the UML specifications describe.