Issue 19330: UML transition-centric state machine arrows (02) (uml2-rtf)
Source: Change Vision (Mr. Michael Jesse Chonoles, mjchonoles(at)yahoo.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: 2nd related issue

All the notation in the alternative transition-centric examples use solid, filled arrow heads.  All the notation for the traditional state-centric examples use v-shaped arrow heads.  However, the text never mentions this difference. The spec should clarify if this is part of the notation.


Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
April 5, 2014: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: "Michael Chonoles" <mjchonoles@yahoo.com>
To: <issues@omg.org>, <uml2-rtf@omg.org>
Cc: "'Jon Siegel'" <siegel@omg.org>,
        "'Alan Moore'" <Alan.Moore@mathworks.co.uk>,
        "'Bran Selic'" <selic@acm.org>,
        "Sanford Friedenthal" <safriedenthal@gmail.com>,
        <rick@ricksteiner.net>, <Oystein.Haugen@sintef.no>
Subject: Two related issues on UML transition-centric state machine arrows
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 08:45:51 -0400
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: Ac9Qy/emmcg99D0WTXaH3mZBt2OVaA==
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org


2nd related issue

All the notation in the alternative transition-centric examples use solid, filled arrow heads.  All the notation for the traditional state-centric examples use v-shaped arrow heads.  However, the text never mentions this difference. The spec should clarify if this is part of the notation.