Issue 19472: No specification of which visibility marking corresponds to which VisibilityKind value (uml2-rtf) Source: Model Driven Solutions (Mr. Steve Cook, steve-c(at)modeldriven.org) Nature: Clarification Severity: Significant Summary: Nowhere does the spec say which visibility marking corresponds to which value. There is no specification that # means protected, for example. This would best live in 7.4.4. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: June 16, 2014: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 16 Jun 2014 05:15:41 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report ******************************************************************************* Name: Steve Cook Employer: mailFrom: stevecook@hotmail.co.uk Terms_Agreement: I agree Specification: UML 2.5 Section: 7.4.4 FormalNumber: ptc/2013-09-05 Version: 2.5 Doc_Year: 2013 Doc_Month: September Doc_Day: 01 Page: 23 Title: No specification of which visibility marking corresponds to which VisibilityKind value Nature: Clarification Severity: Significant CODE: 3TMw8 B1: Report Issue Remote Name: cpc1-bsfd7-2-0-cust55.5-3.cable.virginm.net Remote User: HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.153 Safari/537.36 Time: 05:15 AM Description: Nowhere does the spec say which visibility marking corresponds to which value. There is no specification that # means protected, for example. This would best live in 7.4.4. X-Trusted-NM: yes Subject: Re: issue 19472 -- UML 2 RTF issue From: Nerijus Jankevicius Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:17:00 +0300 Cc: issues@omg.org, uml2-rtf@omg.org To: Juergen Boldt , stevecook@hotmail.co.uk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org In UML 2.4 spec it’s under: 7.3.56 VisibilityKind Notation The following visual presentation options are available for representing VisibilityKind enumeration literal values: • ‘+’ public • ‘-’ private • ‘#’ protected • ‘~’ package. What happens to all “Notation” chapters in UML 2.5 spec? How can we trace that nothing is lost? I still did not get the idea how to browse new UML 2.5 spec and prefer UML 2.4 for quick search of things. Nerijus On Jun 26, 2014, at 6:01 PM, Juergen Boldt wrote: From: webmaster@omg.org Date: 16 Jun 2014 05:15:41 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report ******************************************************************************* Name: Steve Cook Employer: mailFrom: stevecook@hotmail.co.uk Terms_Agreement: I agree Specification: UML 2.5 Section: 7.4.4 FormalNumber: ptc/2013-09-05 Version: 2.5 Doc_Year: 2013 Doc_Month: September Doc_Day: 01 Page: 23 Title: No specification of which visibility marking corresponds to which VisibilityKind value Nature: Clarification Severity: Significant CODE: 3TMw8 B1: Report Issue Remote Name: cpc1-bsfd7-2-0-cust55.5-3.cable.virginm.net Remote User: HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.153 Safari/537.36 Time: 05:15 AM Description: Nowhere does the spec say which visibility marking corresponds to which value. There is no specification that # means protected, for example. This would best live in 7.4.4. Juergen Boldt Director, Member Services 109 Highland Ave Needham, MA 02494 USA Tel: +1 (781) 444 0404 x 132 fax: +1 (781) 444 0320 www.omg.org [] From: Ed Seidewitz To: Nerijus Jankevicius CC: Juergen Boldt , "stevecook@hotmail.co.uk" , "issues@omg.org" , "uml2-rtf@omg.org" Subject: Re: issue 19472 -- UML 2 RTF issue Thread-Topic: issue 19472 -- UML 2 RTF issue Thread-Index: AQHPkU/dBoCaiyDVgUOzm478a5BaM5uE0AEAgAAt4Dg= Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:01:12 +0000 Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-Mailprotector-Decision: deliver X-Mailprotector-Original-Sender: ed-s@modeldriven.com X-Mailprotector-Original-Recipients: nerijus@nomagic.com, juergen@omg.org, stevecook@hotmail.co.uk, issues@omg.org, uml2-rtf@omg.org X-Mailprotector-Redirect-To: ed-s@modeldriven.com X-Mailprotector-Connection: TLSv1|cas203.mailprotector.com|54.208.113.85|CAS203.mailprotector.local|0.0|0.0|0|||0|0|0|0 X-Mailprotector-Results: clean X-Mailprotector-Score: 0 X-Mailprotector-IP-Analysis: 0, 54.208.113.85, Ugly c=0 p=0 Source New X-Mailprotector-Scan-Diagnostics: 0-0-0-15448-c X-Mailprotector-ID: 694d2f16-5a39-4976-9530-f36128cd3247 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org The notation sections are now part of the main body of the text in each are (which includes sections on Abstract Syntax, Semantics, Notation and Examples). The notation for visibility should gave been under 7.4.4, the notation section for Namespaces. We tried hard to make sure that everything in the UML 2.4.1 spec found its place in the UML 2.5 spec, generally by just consolidating the 2.4.1 text for all meta classes in an area for our first draft of UML 2.5 text. Obviously we were not perfect, though. (The Namespaces subclause was one I wrote, so the oversight was mine in this case.) Ed Sent from my iPad On Jun 27, 2014, at 12:18 AM, "Nerijus Jankevicius" wrote: In UML 2.4 spec it’s under: 7.3.56 VisibilityKind Notation The following visual presentation options are available for representing VisibilityKind enumeration literal values: • ‘+’ public • ‘-’ private • ‘#’ protected • ‘~’ package. What happens to all “Notation” chapters in UML 2.5 spec? How can we trace that nothing is lost? I still did not get the idea how to browse new UML 2.5 spec and prefer UML 2.4 for quick search of things. Nerijus On Jun 26, 2014, at 6:01 PM, Juergen Boldt wrote: From: webmaster@omg.org Date: 16 Jun 2014 05:15:41 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report ******************************************************************************* Name: Steve Cook Employer: mailFrom: stevecook@hotmail.co.uk Terms_Agreement: I agree Specification: UML 2.5 Section: 7.4.4 FormalNumber: ptc/2013-09-05 Version: 2.5 Doc_Year: 2013 Doc_Month: September Doc_Day: 01 Page: 23 Title: No specification of which visibility marking corresponds to which VisibilityKind value Nature: Clarification Severity: Significant CODE: 3TMw8 B1: Report Issue Remote Name: cpc1-bsfd7-2-0-cust55.5-3.cable.virginm.net Remote User: HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.153 Safari/537.36 Time: 05:15 AM Description: Nowhere does the spec say which visibility marking corresponds to which value. There is no specification that # means protected, for example. This would best live in 7.4.4. Juergen Boldt Director, Member Services 109 Highland Ave Needham, MA 02494 USA Tel: +1 (781) 444 0404 x 132 fax: +1 (781) 444 0320 www.omg.org []