Issue 19578: Need to define Requirement Relationship compartment (sysml-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Clarification Severity: Significant Summary: Requirement relationships were originally intended to be optionally depicted in a compartment notation, in a manner similar to allocation relationships (see Table 15.1 on page 130). Table 16.1 does not depict requirement compartment notation, but it is referenced in section 16.3.1.2 and 16.3.1.4. Requirement relationship compartment notation needs to be fully elaborated in the spec, including additional elements in Table 16.1 and section 16.3.1, in a manner consistent with allocation compartment format in Chapter 15. Resolution: Add Requirement Compartments to Table 16.1 The requirements relationships compartment was mistakenly omitted from Table 16.1. This compartment notation should be added to the Requirement element, consistent both with the callout notations in Table 16.2 and the allocation compartment shown in Table 15,1 (derived, derivedFrom, satisfiedBy, verifiedBy, refinedBy, tracedTo, master, slave; all in italics). Additionally, NamedElement should be added to the end of Table 16.1 showing compartment notation for requirement relationships consistent with callout notations in Table 16.2 (satisfies, verifies, refines, tracedFrom; all in italics) Revised Text: Table 16.1 update attached. No text update required. Actions taken: August 14, 2014: received issue January 3, 2017: Resolved April 6, 2017: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 14 Aug 2014 10:33:37 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report ******************************************************************************* Name: Rick Steiner Employer: Skygazer Consulting mailFrom: rick@ricksteiner.net Terms_Agreement: I agree Specification: OMG SysML Section: 16.3.1 FormalNumber: ptc/2013-11-07 Version: 1.4 Doc_Year: 2013 Doc_Month: October Doc_Day: Day Page: 144 Title: Need to define Requirement Relationship compartment Nature: Clarification Severity: Significant CODE: 3TMw8 B1: Report Issue Remote Name: cpe-66-27-74-102.san.res.rr.com Remote User: HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_4) AppleWebKit/537.77.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.0.5 Safari/537.77.4 Time: 10:33 AM Description: Requirement relationships were originally intended to be optionally depicted in a compartment notation, in a manner similar to allocation relationships (see Table 15.1 on page 130). Table 16.1 does not depict requirement compartment notation, but it is referenced in section 16.3.1.2 and 16.3.1.4. Requirement relationship compartment notation needs to be fully elaborated in the spec, including additional elements in Table 16.1 and section 16.3.1, in a manner consistent with allocation compartment format in Chapter 15.