Issue 1975:  Typo in page 15-44 (interop)
Source:  (, )
Nature:  Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Summary: Page 15-44, second para after bullet list, the word LOCATION_FORWARD
 appears in the wrong font (in two places).
 

Resolution: duplicate of issue # 2045
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
September 18, 1998: received issue
March 8, 1999: closed issue
Discussion: 
 received issue
End of Annotations:=====
Return-Path: <michi@dstc.edu.au>
X-Authentication-Warning: fatcat.dstc.edu.au: michi owned process
doing -bs
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 14:24:47 +1000 (EST)
From: Michi Henning <michi@dstc.edu.au>
To: interop@omg.org
Subject: GIOP/IIOP version alignment?

Section 15.7 of 98-08-13 says:

	IIOP 1.0 is based GIOP 1.0.

	IIOP 1.1 can be based on either GIOP 1.0 or GIOP 1.1...

The section says nothing about IIOP 1.2. Can IIOP 1.2 be used with
GIOP 1.0 and 1.1?

							Cheers,

								Michi.


Return-Path: <jmischki@wheel.dcn.davis.ca.us>
From: Jeffrey Mischkinsky <jmischki@wheel.dcn.davis.ca.us>
Subject: Re: GIOP/IIOP version alignment?
To: michi@dstc.edu.au (Michi Henning)
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 15:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: interop@omg.org

'Michi Henning' writes:
> 
> Section 15.7 of 98-08-13 says:
> 
>	IIOP 1.0 is based GIOP 1.0.
> 
>	IIOP 1.1 can be based on either GIOP 1.0 or GIOP 1.1...
> 
> The section says nothing about IIOP 1.2. Can IIOP 1.2 be used with
> GIOP 1.0 and 1.1?
yes, this is editorial, as it is just a restatement of the general
> rules,
for the specific minor version in question.
  jeff

> 


-- 
Jeff Mischkinsky                
jmischki@dcn.davis.ca.us        +1 530-758-9850
jeffm@inprise.com		+1 650-358-3049
jeffm@visigenic.com             +1 650-358-3049