Issue 19772: Clarify Property Qualifiers with a full Example (uml2-rtf)
Source: Model Driven Solutions (Dr. Edward Willink, ed(at)willink.me.uk)
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary: Figure 11.37 has an example with presumably an Association for:


Bank::persons : Person[*] {opposites Person::banks}
Person::banks : Bank[*] {opposites Bank::persons}


adding explicit names for clarity.


The qualifier presumably adds a nested Property


Bank::persons::accountNo : Person[?]


specifying an important multiplicity and a possibly redundant type, although a qualified association might perhaps return a derived type.


Where is it modeled that the qualifier itself is Integer[1] or perhaps String[3]?

Presumably an opposite qualifier is required and this must form part of a refined Association. If this is indeed the case it needs a better example. If it not the case, the alternative solution needs an example.
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
June 2, 2015: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 02 Jun 2015 05:19:02 -0400
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:            E.D Willink
Employer:        
mailFrom:        ed@willink.me.uk
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   UML 2.5
Section:         11.5
FormalNumber:    13-09-05
Version:         2.5
Doc_Year:        Year
Doc_Month:       Month
Doc_Day:         Day
Page:            207
Title:           Clarify Property Qualifiers with a full Example
Nature:          Clarification
Severity:        Minor
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue
Remote Name:     edwillink.plus.com
Remote User:     
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0
Time:            05:18 AM


Description:


(JIRA won't let me Create this Issue)


Figure 11.37 has an example with presumably an Association for:


Bank::persons : Person[*] {opposites Person::banks}
Person::banks : Bank[*] {opposites Bank::persons}


adding explicit names for clarity.


The qualifier presumably adds a nested Property


Bank::persons::accountNo : Person[?]


specifying an important multiplicity and a possibly redundant type, although a qualified association might perhaps return a derived type.


Where is it modeled that the qualifier itself is Integer[1] or perhaps String[3]?

Presumably an opposite qualifier is required and this must form part of a refined Association. If this is indeed the case it needs a better example. If it not the case, the alternative solution needs an example.