Issue 200:  fixed- vs. variable-length types (cxx_revision)
Source:  (, )
Nature:  Uncategorized
Severity:  MEDIUM
Summary: Summary: Sec 16.8 Pg 16-22 CORBA2.0, p. 28, Section 3.10, para 2: Devastating to programmers. Simple change to IDL an IDL file will require a complete rewrite of application code

Resolution:  Duplicate of issue123
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
October 14, 1996: received issue
February 19, 1999: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
This is issue # 200


Title:    fixed- vs. variable-length types 


 Desc: Sec 16.8 Pg 16-22 CORBA2.0, p. 28, Section 3.10, para 2:          
          Devastating to programmers. Simple change to IDL an IDL file will 
          require a complete rewrite of application code  


-Juergen


>From juergen@omg.org  Fri Oct 25 11:04:30 1996
Received: from rune.omg.org by amethyst.omg.org.omg.org
(5.4R2.01/1.34)
	id AA26261; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 11:04:30 -0400
Message-Id: <2.2.32.19961025150359.00749b30@amethyst.omg.org>
X-Sender: juergen@amethyst.omg.org
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 11:03:59 -0400
To: issues, cxx_revision
From: Juergen Boldt <juergen@omg.org>
Subject: issue200

This is issue # 200


Title:    fixed- vs. variable-length types 


 Desc: Sec 16.8 Pg 16-22 CORBA2.0, p. 28, Section 3.10, para 2:
  
          Devastating to programmers. Simple change to IDL an IDL file
will 
          require a complete rewrite of application code  


-Juergen