Issue 2045: Obsolete text in ptc/98-08-13.pdf (interop) Source: (, ) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Summary: In section 15.7, the second two paragraphs: "IIOP 1.0 is based on GIOP 1.0. IIOP 1.1 can be based on either GIOP 1.0 or GIOP 1.1. An IIOP 1.1 client can either support both GIP 1.0 and 1.1, or GIOP 1.1 only. An IIOP 1.1 server must support both GIOP 1.0 and GIOP 1.1. An IIOP 1.1 server must be able to receive both GIOP 1.0 and GIOP 1.1 requests and reply using the same GIOP revision as invoked." only refer to GIOP 1.0 and 1.1, not 1.2. In light of the note in section 15.7.2, these two paragraphs are obsolete and could be removed, since the note covers the same information in a more generic way. Resolution: resolved Revised Text: Replace the last paragraph of 15.7 introduction with the following: " IIOP 1.1 can be based on either GIOP 1.0 or 1.1. An IIOP 1.1 client must support GIOP 1.1, and may also support GIOP 1.0. An IIOP 1.1 server must support processing both GIOP 1.0 and GIOP 1.1 messages. IIOP 1.2 can be based on either GIOP minor versions 1.0, 1.1, or 1.2. An IIOP 1.2 client must support GIOP 1.2, and may also support lesser GIOP minor versions. An IIOP 1.2 server must also support processing messages with all lesser GIOP versions." " Actions taken: October 6, 1998: received issue March 8, 1999: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== Return-Path: Sender: jon@floorboard.com Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1998 13:16:20 -0700 From: Jonathan Biggar X-Accept-Language: en To: issues@omg.org, interop@omg.org Subject: Obsolete text in ptc/98-08-13.pdf In section 15.7, the second two paragraphs: "IIOP 1.0 is based on GIOP 1.0. IIOP 1.1 can be based on either GIOP 1.0 or GIOP 1.1. An IIOP 1.1 client can either support both GIP 1.0 and 1.1, or GIOP 1.1 only. An IIOP 1.1 server must support both GIOP 1.0 and GIOP 1.1. An IIOP 1.1 server must be able to receive both GIOP 1.0 and GIOP 1.1 requests and reply using the same GIOP revision as invoked." only refer to GIOP 1.0 and 1.1, not 1.2. In light of the note in section 15.7.2, these two paragraphs are obsolete and could be removed, since the note covers the same information in a more generic way. -- Jon Biggar Floorboard Software jon@floorboard.com jon@biggar.org