Issue 2082: Mapping of RuntimeException (java2idl-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Summary: If a Java method explictly declares that it throws RuntimeException or some subclass, the current spec says that these should be retained in the mapping to IDL. I think this is wrong; they should be dropped when mapping to IDL. The reasoning is along the same lines as dropping subclasses of RemoteException. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: October 14, 1998: received issue February 23, 1999: closed issue Discussion: issue resolved and closed End of Annotations:===== Return-Path: Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 19:45:58 +0100 From: Simon Nash Organization: IBM To: issues@omg.org CC: java2idl-rtf@omg.org Subject: Mapping of RuntimeExceptions The following Java to IDL issue was raised by Bob Scheifler. It needs to be added to the issues database. If a Java method explictly declares that it throws RuntimeException or some subclass, the current spec says that these should be retained in the mapping to IDL. I think this is wrong; they should be dropped when mapping to IDL. The reasoning is along the same lines as dropping subclasses of RemoteException. Simon -- Simon C Nash, IBM Java Technology Centre, Hursley, UK MailPoint 146, x245156 Tel. 01962 815156 or +44-1962-815156 Internet: nash@hursley.ibm.com Notes mail: Simon Nash@ibmgb