Issue 2166:  UML - IDL consistency of role names (pdm-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature:  Revision
Severity:  Minor
Summary: Summary: Problem: The role names in the IDL and would-be CDL are NOT the same 
 as the role names in the UML in section 2.7, e.g. UML prcl_of_dr
 is interface PrclOfDr.
 
 (In most sections, the role names do not appear in the UML at all.
 The only other section in which the role names appear in the UML
 model is 2.2, and in that section the UML and IDL match.)
 
 Recommendation:  Either remove the role names from the model in 2.7.2
 or spell them to match the IDL.
 
 

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
November 4, 1998: received issue
August 24, 1999: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
Return-Path: <edbark@cme.nist.gov>
From: Ed Barkmeyer <edbark@cme.nist.gov>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 11:59:26 -0500 (EST)
To: issues@omg.org
Subject: PDM Enablers issue: UML - IDL consistency of role names
Cc: pdm-rtf@omg.org
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII

Reference: PDM Enablers section 2.7

Severity: Editorial.

Problem: The role names in the IDL and would-be CDL are NOT the same 
as the role names in the UML in section 2.7, e.g. UML prcl_of_dr
is interface PrclOfDr.

(In most sections, the role names do not appear in the UML at all.
The only other section in which the role names appear in the UML
model is 2.2, and in that section the UML and IDL match.)

Recommendation:  Either remove the role names from the model in 2.7.2
or spell them to match the IDL.

-Ed