Issue 2185: Edit the MOF specification to improve clarity and readability (mof-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Revision Severity: Significant Summary: Summary: he entire specification is in need of revision to improve its readability, structure and technical consistency and clarity. This requires a lot of copy editting work for the RTF! Additional text: For example, the semantics section should be repartitioned into sections on `semantic constraints on the MOF Model meta-models", `structural semantics of models" and `operational semantics of mapped interfaces". Resolution: closed, resolved Revised Text: Actions taken: November 6, 1998: received issue May 8, 2000: closed issue Discussion: Status: Specific text changes will be considered if provided in time. [KR] Many things need doing. The constraints are inconsistent throughout the document. All the operation names in "Mof Model and Interfaces" and the Reflective interface are in different format to the MODL etc. Implementation: Constraints fixed up. Documentation of Reflective and Templates completely reorganized. Added new introductory chapter before the big Model chapter. Done. [SC] End of Annotations:===== Return-Path: To: mof-rtf@omg.org, issues@omg.org Errors-to: request@omg.org Subject: Edit the MOF specification to improve clarity and readability Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1998 16:07:27 +1000 From: Stephen Crawley ["new issue 15" from Seattle RTF doc.] Source: DSTC (Dr. Stephen Crawley, crawley@dstc.edu.au) Nature: Revision Severity: Significant Summary: The entire specification is in need of revision to improve its readability, structure and technical consistency and clarity. This requires a lot of copy editting work for the RTF! Additional text: For example, the semantics section should be repartitioned into sections on `semantic constraints on the MOF Model meta-models', `structural semantics of models' and `operational semantics of mapped interfaces'.