Issue 2225:  javax.rmi package use (java2idl-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature:  Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Summary: It has concerned me for a while the use of the javax.rmi package in the Java
 to IDL mapping.  I think that PortableRemoteObject and other classes should be
 placed in a subpackage.  We may in the future put subpackages in javax.rmi and
 would like it organized much better than it is currently.  The
 PortableRemoteObject class should be put in a subpackage "portable" or
 something else.  I"d like to raise this as an issue to discuss at the RTF.
 There are still other issues that are being ironed out, and I think that this
 one can be addressed along with the others.
 

Resolution: Closed, no change
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
November 19, 1998: received issue
June 4, 1999: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
Return-Path: <rws@East.Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 10:24:15 -0500 (EST)
From: Bob Scheifler - SMI Software Development <rws@East.Sun.COM>
Reply-To: Bob Scheifler - SMI Software Development <rws@East.Sun.COM>
Subject: javax.rmi package use
To: issues@omg.org
Cc: java2idl-rtf@omg.org
Content-MD5: mOBi1k7Y19Qp3Uk25h29jg==


------------- Begin Forwarded Message -------------

From: ann@zaphod (Ann Wollrath - JavaSoft East)
To: nash@hursley.ibm.com
Subject: javax.rmi package use
Cc: ann@zaphod, rws@zaphod

Hi Simon,

It has concerned me for a while the use of the javax.rmi package in
the Java
to IDL mapping.  I think that PortableRemoteObject and other classes
should be
placed in a subpackage.  We may in the future put subpackages in
javax.rmi and
would like it organized much better than it is currently.  The
PortableRemoteObject class should be put in a subpackage "portable" or
something else.  I'd like to raise this as an issue to discuss at the
RTF.
There are still other issues that are being ironed out, and I think
that this
one can be addressed along with the others.

-- Ann

------------- End Forwarded Message -------------