Issue 2289: Missing OCL (uml2-superstructure-ftf) Source: (, ) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Summary: I would like to note that in the UML Semantics specification (versions 1.1 and 1.2) the third well-formedness rule for Association does not have an OCL expression. It has only the natural language expression. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: January 5, 1999: received issue March 9, 2005: closed issue Discussion: No longer applies - even at UML 1.3 all the well-formedness rules for Associations had OCL End of Annotations:===== Return-Path: X-Sender: dfrankel@pop.usit.net Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 14:03:47 -0800 To: uml-rtf@omg.org From: "David S. Frankel" Subject: Missing OCL All-- I would like to note that in the UML Semantics specification (versions 1.1 and 1.2) the third well-formedness rule for Association does not have an OCL expression. It has only the natural language expression. --David Frankel ============================= David S. Frankel Director, Advanced Architecture Genesis Development Corporation 741 Santiago Court Chico, CA 95973-8781 U.S.A. http://www.gendev.com dfrankel@gendev.com +1-530-893-1100 phone +1-530-893-1153 fax ============================= Return-Path: From: "KOBRYN, Cris" To: "David S. Frankel" Cc: uml-rtf@omg.org Subject: RE: Missing OCL Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 15:40:25 -0800 > I would like to note that in the UML Semantics specification > (versions 1.1 > and 1.2) the third well-formedness rule for Association does > not have an > OCL expression. It has only the natural language expression. David, This has been fixed in 1.3. Thanks, Cris