Issue 2326: Clarification of OBV GIOP encoding rules (interop) Source: (, ) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Summary: The last sentence of section 15.3.7 "The abstract encoding of value type always includes RepositoryId information." needs to appear somewhere in section 15.3.4.1. Resolution: see above Revised Text: Add the following new paragraph preceding the paragraph on page 15-15 that starts "If the receiving context ...". " For value types marshaled as abstract interfaces (see section 15.3.7), repository ID information must be included in the value type encoding. " Actions taken: January 21, 1999: received issue March 1, 1999: moved from Core RTF to Interop March 8, 1999: closed issue Discussion: Editorial repeat of text from 15.3.7 to also appear in 15.3.4.1 Since this issue is purely editorial, it was not voted by the RTF. End of Annotations:===== Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 17:03:49 +0000 From: Simon Nash Organization: IBM To: issues@omg.org CC: orb_revision@omg.org Subject: Clarification of OBV GIOP encoding rules The last sentence of section 15.3.7 "The abstract encoding of value type always includes RepositoryId information." needs to appear somewhere in section 15.3.4.1. Proposed resolution: Add the following new paragraph preceding the paragraph on page 15-15 that starts "If the receiving context ...". For value types marshalled as abstract interfaces (see section 15.3.7), repository ID information must be included in the value type encoding. Simon -- Simon C Nash, Technology Architect, IBM Java Technology Centre Tel. +44-1962-815156 Fax +44-1962-818999 Hursley, England Internet: nash@hursley.ibm.com Lotus Notes: Simon Nash@ibmgb Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 15:00:45 +0000 From: Simon Nash Organization: IBM X-Accept-Language: en To: jis@fpk.hp.com CC: orb_revision@omg.org Subject: Issue 2326: Clarification of OBV GIOP encoding rules Jishnu, Issue 2326 appears in the OMG list of issues assigned to the orb_revision RTF, but it does not appear in the list that you are maintaining. What is the status of this issue? Does it still need to be voted on? Here's the issue and proposed resolution that I sent: Issue: The last sentence of section 15.3.7 "The abstract encoding of value type always includes RepositoryId information." needs to appear somewhere in section 15.3.4.1. Proposed resolution: Add the following new paragraph preceding the paragraph on page 15-15 that starts "If the receiving context ...". For value types marshalled as abstract interfaces (see section 15.3.7), repository ID information must be included in the value type encoding. Simon -- Simon C Nash, Technology Architect, IBM Java Technology Centre Tel. +44-1962-815156 Fax +44-1962-818999 Hursley, England Internet: nash@hursley.ibm.com Lotus Notes: Simon Nash@ibmgb Sender: jis@fpk.hp.com Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 10:31:20 -0500 From: Jishnu Mukerji Organization: Hewlett-Packard New Jersey Laboratories To: Juergen Boldt , Tom Rutt CC: Simon Nash , orb_revision@omg.org Subject: Re: Issue 2326: Clarification of OBV GIOP encoding rules References: <36DAAB9D.155D4AFF@hursley.ibm.com> Juergen, 2326 does not belong to orb_revision. It deals with Chapter 15 and hence belongs to interop. Please move it there. Thanks, Jishnu. -- Jishnu Mukerji Systems Architect Email: jis@fpk.hp.com Hewlett-Packard New Jersey Labs, Tel: +1 973 443 7528 300 Campus Drive, 2E-62, Fax: +1 973 443 7422 Florham Park, NJ 07932, USA.