Issue 2438: Change name DocumentRevisionRelationship to PartDocumentRelationship (pdm-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Summary: Problem: The name DocumentRevisionRelationship is misleading in that it has nothing to do with revising Document objects per se, and it does not inherit from RevisionRelationship (2.3.14) as one might expect. Moreover, this relationship is one of three ways of characterising a PartRevisionChangeLevel -- by Document, by Data set and by Structure. The other two are called PartDataRelationship and PartStructureRelationship. This one should be called PartDocumentRelationship. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: February 4, 1999: received issue August 24, 1999: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== From: Ed Barkmeyer Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 13:38:29 -0500 (EST) To: issues@omg.org Subject: PDM Enablers: PartRevision - DocumentRevision relationship Cc: pdm-rtf@omg.org X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII Reference: PDM Enablers 2.7.3.4 Title: Change name DocumentRevisionRelationship to PartDocumentRelationship. Problem: The name DocumentRevisionRelationship is misleading in that it has nothing to do with revising Document objects per se, and it does not inherit from RevisionRelationship (2.3.14) as one might expect. Moreover, this relationship is one of three ways of characterising a PartRevisionChangeLevel -- by Document, by Data set and by Structure. The other two are called PartDataRelationship and PartStructureRelationship. This one should be called PartDocumentRelationship. -Ed (P.S. This is by agreement of the RTF and the proposed resolution text will follow to the RTF email list.) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Edward J. Barkmeyer Email: edbark@nist.gov National Institute of Standards & Technology Manufacturing Systems Integration Division 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8260 Tel: +1 301-975-3528 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8260 FAX: +1 301-975-4482