Issue 2499:  Add AbstractBase base type to IDL language? (cxx_revision)
Source:  (, )
Nature:  Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Summary: Does it make sense to add the AbstractBase base
 type to the IDL language, so that operations could
 receive an AbstractBase parameter?
 

Resolution: close with no change
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
March 1, 1999: received issue
June 13, 2000: closed issue
Discussion: 
Close no change. AbstractBase is already defined in IDL as a native type. Some disagree with this definition, and it may change
in the future, but nevertheless it is workable for now. 

End of Annotations:=====
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 16:44:24 -0500 (EST)
From: fp@informatik.uni-frankfurt.de
To: juergen@omg.org, web-incoming@omg.org
Subject: Issue Report

Name: Frank Pilhofer
Company: Universitdt Frankfurt
mailFrom: fp@informatik.uni-frankfurt.de
Notification: Yes
Specification: IDL
Section: 3
Formal #: ptc/98-10-04
Version: 2.3a
Revision_Date: 11/15/98
Page: 15
Nature: Enhancement
Severity: Minor
full_desc: Does it make sense to add the AbstractBase base
type to the IDL language, so that operations could
receive an AbstractBase parameter?

submit: Submit Issue Report