Issue 2583: Title does not cover the use of SS7 as signaling transpor (incorba-ftf) Source: (, ) Nature: Revision Severity: Summary: Summary: Problem: Title does not cover the use of SS7 as signaling transport. This case is not a TC interworking. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: April 1, 1999: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== Issue: 1 Section number: Title Problem: Title does not cover the use of SS7 as signaling transport. This case is not a TC interworking. Proposed solution: Rationale: From: "Rob Brennan" To: Subject: IN/CORBA: Issue 2583 Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 17:16:27 -0000 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1154 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-UIDL: g;T!!BC8!!5TO!!5G]!! issue reads: "Title does not cover the use of SS7 as signaling transport. This case is not a TC interworking. " What do people think of this? I'd like to call the chapter in the OMG Telecoms spec "SS.7 Interworking" although many aspects of SS.7 are not covered. This chapter could then be expanded upon by future RFPs, say in the area of ISUP interworking. An alternative suggestion would be to split it into two chapters, one on TC interworking, one on SIOP. I don't know if we have the power to do this (I'll check with Linda). rgds rob From: "Nilo Mitra (EUS)" To: "'Rob Brennan'" , incorba-ftf@omg.org Subject: RE: IN/CORBA: Issue 2583 Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 17:07:30 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-UIDL: njM!!"1Ge9*eRd9A+Xd9 How about the title "CORBA/TC Interworking and CORBA/SS7 Transport"? I'd say leave it to readers to figure out exactly what aspect of SS7 transport is described. The proposed title is at least not misleading. Nilo -----Original Message----- From: Rob Brennan [mailto:brennanr@Teltec.DCU.IE] Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 12:16 PM To: incorba-ftf@omg.org Subject: IN/CORBA: Issue 2583 issue reads: "Title does not cover the use of SS7 as signaling transport. This case is not a TC interworking. " What do people think of this? I'd like to call the chapter in the OMG Telecoms spec "SS.7 Interworking" although many aspects of SS.7 are not covered. This chapter could then be expanded upon by future RFPs, say in the area of ISUP interworking. An alternative suggestion would be to split it into two chapters, one on TC interworking, one on SIOP. I don't know if we have the power to do this (I'll check with Linda). rgds rob From: "Rob Brennan" To: Subject: Re: IN/CORBA: Issue 2583 Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 13:57:44 -0000 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1154 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-UIDL: ;i!!!6Ind9#VQ!!!]=e9 > From: Nilo Mitra (EUS) > How about the title "CORBA/TC Interworking and CORBA/SS7 Transport"? > This sounds good. rgds rob From: "Rob Brennan" To: "ftf" Cc: "Nils Fischbeck" , "Nilo Mitra (EUS)" , "Stephen Brennan" , , Subject: IN/CORBA: Issue 2583 - VOTE Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 13:54:42 -0000 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1154 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-UIDL: ZU2!!jPYd9e/h!!ab`!! I propose the following resolution for issue 2583: Please return a vote to me (brennanr@teltec.dcu.ie) by 12 PM GMT DECEMBER 10th 1999 Voting lists, issues, resolutions etc can be found from the IN/CORBA FTF Home at: http://www.teltec.dcu.ie/~brennanr/incorba-ftf/ ****Please remember that if you consistently fail to vote you lose the power to vote.**** BEGIN PROPOSED RESOLUTION change the title of the specification to: "CORBA/TC Interworking and CORBA/SS7 Transport" END PROPOSED RESOLUTION From: Fischbeck Nils To: ftf Subject: AW: IN/CORBA: Issue 2583 Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 21:38:20 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain X-UIDL: Od5!!AQ;!!hg_d9PG&!! The SIOP part of the CORBA/IN RFP reply can go either 1. as a new chapter to the CORBA core document or 2. as a chapter of document CORBA/TC Interworking If we choose 1) the title should not contain CORBA/SS.7 Transport. In this case I would strongly recommend not to adopt the proposal for issue 2583. I think that SIOP is no core technology of CORBA so it should not go to the core document. Only the allocated tags should go the the tags list of the core document which refer to the telecom domain specification CORBA/TC interworking. So I would go for 2) I find the part of the title "CORBA/SS.7 Transport" confusing. How about the title "CORBA/TC interworking and SIOP". Can this be a friendly ammendment for issue 2583, Rob? Regards Nils --- Nils Fischbeck +49 03834 555 8178 SIEMENS AG, ICN WN AN AM46 New E-mail address: Nils.Fischbeck@icn.siemens.de From: "Nilo Mitra (EUS)" To: "'incorba-ftf@omg.org'" Subject: FW: IN/CORBA: Issue 2583 Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 10:11:18 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-UIDL: _%dd9-SSd9GBi!!gYWd9 Yes, Nils' suggestion for making the title "CORBA/TC Interworking and SIOP" seems best but please can we spell out SIOP? A minor amendment to his friendly amendment. Thanks, Nilo -----Original Message----- From: Fischbeck Nils [mailto:Nils.Fischbeck@icn.siemens.de] Sent: Thursday, December 09, 1999 3:38 PM To: ftf Subject: AW: IN/CORBA: Issue 2583 The SIOP part of the CORBA/IN RFP reply can go either 1. as a new chapter to the CORBA core document or 2. as a chapter of document CORBA/TC Interworking If we choose 1) the title should not contain CORBA/SS.7 Transport. In this case I would strongly recommend not to adopt the proposal for issue 2583. I think that SIOP is no core technology of CORBA so it should not go to the core document. Only the allocated tags should go the the tags list of the core document which refer to the telecom domain specification CORBA/TC interworking. So I would go for 2) I find the part of the title "CORBA/SS.7 Transport" confusing. How about the title "CORBA/TC interworking and SIOP". Can this be a friendly ammendment for issue 2583, Rob? Regards Nils --- Nils Fischbeck +49 03834 555 8178 SIEMENS AG, ICN WN AN AM46 New E-mail address: Nils.Fischbeck@icn.siemens.de