Issue 2952: Interop, 15.7.3 unclear wording (interop) Source: (, ) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: I do have a quick question on one part and that is Section 15.7.3 IIOP IOR Profile Components. This first paragraph has the following line in it: " All these components are optional presence in the IIOP profile and cannot be dropped from an IIOP 1.1 or 1.2 IOR". Now I must admit that I am new to this CORBA thing, but is there something wrong with this sentence? I am not quite sure what this means and the grammar seems quite odd ("are optional prensence"?). Any chance someone could translate? Resolution: see above Revised Text: Actions taken: October 15, 1999: received issue May 13, 2002: closed issue Discussion: Rationale for Rejection The quoted text has to do with fragmenting but since the example request is not fragmented, the padding restriction does not apply. End of Annotations:===== Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 16:02:11 +1000 (EST) From: Michi Henning X-Sender: michi@bobo.triodia.com Reply-To: interop@omg.org To: issues@omg.org cc: interop@omg.org Subject: Interop, 15.7.3 unclear wording Message-ID: Organization: Object Oriented Concepts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-UIDL: N+L!!0*`d9=,Ae91:Oe9 I'm forwarding this from comp.object.corba. I agree with the poster -- the words in the spec are less than crystal clear... Cheers, Michi. -- Michi Henning +61 7 3236 1633 Object Oriented Concepts +61 4 1118 2700 (mobile) PO Box 372 +61 7 3211 0047 (fax) Annerley 4103 michi@ooc.com.au AUSTRALIA http://www.ooc.com ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bruce Trask Organization: PCNet Newsgroups: comp.object.corba Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 20:29:31 -0400 Subject: Re: Contents of the IOR file Thanks, I downloaded the chapters from the spec that you mentioned. I am going to plow through them. I do have a quick question on one part and that is Section 15.7.3 IIOP IOR Profile Components. This first paragraph has the following line in it: " All these components are optional presence in the IIOP profile and cannot be dropped from an IIOP 1.1 or 1.2 IOR". Now I must admit that I am new to this CORBA thing, but is there something wrong with this sentence? I am not quite sure what this means and the grammar seems quite odd ("are optional prensence"?). Any chance someone could translate? Thanks in advance, Bruce