Issue 3209: Illegal return statement (java-rtf)
Source: NetAcquire Corporation (Mr. Joachim Achtzehnter, joachima(at)netacquire.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: The method _releaseReply in class org.omg.CORBA.portable.ObjectImpl
has a return value of type void, yet the specification requires this
implementation:

public void _releaseReply(org.omg.CORBA.portable.InputStream is) {
  return _get_delegate().releaseReply(this, is);
}

The return statement is illegal in a method with a void return type. Should
delete the word 'return' from the specification.

PS: Editorial: the diagram on page 1-115 has 'CORBA' missing from some
of the class names.

Resolution: Closed...editorial issue
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
January 11, 2000: received issue
February 7, 2000: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:49:16 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200001120049.TAA06120@emerald.omg.org>
From: joachim@mercury.bc.ca
To: juergen@omg.org, web-incoming@omg.org
Subject: Issue Report
Content-Type: text
X-UIDL: %TIe97?B!!+LX!!g~R!!

Name: Joachim Avchtzehnter
Company: Mercury Scheduling Inc.
mailFrom: joachim@mercury.bc.ca
Notification: Yes
Specification: IDL to Java Language Mapping
Section: 1.21.5.3
Formal #: 99-07-53
Version: 2.3
Revision_Date: 06/00/1999
Page: 1-117
Nature: Revision
Severity: Minor
full_desc: The method _releaseReply in class
org.omg.CORBA.portable.ObjectImpl
has a return value of type void, yet the specification requires this
implementation:

public void _releaseReply(org.omg.CORBA.portable.InputStream is) {
  return _get_delegate().releaseReply(this, is);
}

The return statement is illegal in a method with a void return
type. Should
delete the word 'return' from the specification.

PS: Editorial: the diagram on page 1-115 has 'CORBA' missing from some
of the class names.

submit: Submit Issue Report

From: Jeffrey Mischkinsky <jmischki@wheel.dcn.davis.ca.us>
Message-Id: <200002040401.UAA08373@wheel.dcn.davis.ca.us>
Subject: Re: issue 3209 -- Java RTF issue
To: juergen@omg.org (Juergen Boldt)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 20:01:27 -0800 (PST)
Cc: java-rtf@omg.org
In-Reply-To: <4.1.20000203151428.00a72ef0@emerald.omg.org> from
"Juergen Boldt" at Feb 03, 2000 03:15:05 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-UIDL: 405e9;mKe9G6g!!l`l!!

Juergen,
   These are BOTH editorial. Please mark as CLOSED EDITORIAL, or
better yet
   lose it from the issues database -- that shouldn't be hard :-)

   The java sources which the doc clearly states are definitive
(because the
   doc can't be compiled) have it correctly.

   I was just about the post the updated java chapter, but i'll fix
these
   before sending it in.

   jeff

'Juergen Boldt' writes:
> 
> This is issue # 3209
> 
> Illegal return statement
> 
> The method _releaseReply in class org.omg.CORBA.portable.ObjectImpl
> has a return value of type void, yet the specification requires this
> implementation:
> 
> public void _releaseReply(org.omg.CORBA.portable.InputStream is) {
>   return _get_delegate().releaseReply(this, is);
> }
> 
> The return statement is illegal in a method with a void return
> type. Should
> delete the word 'return' from the specification.
> 
> PS: Editorial: the diagram on page 1-115 has 'CORBA' missing from
> some
> of the class names.
> 
> ================================================================
> 
> Juergen Boldt
> Senior Member of Technical Staff
> 
> Object Management Group		Tel. +1-781 444 0404  ext. 132
> 250 First Avenue, Suite 201		Fax: +1-781 444 0320
> Needham, MA 02494, USA		Email: juergen@omg.org
> 
> 
>  
> ================================================================
> 


-- 
Jeff Mischkinsky                
jmischki@dcn.davis.ca.us        +1 530-758-9850
jeff@persistence.com		+1 650-372-3604