Issue 3276: UML RTF 1.4 Issue: Dynamic concurrency arguments (uml2-superstructure-ftf)
Source: NIST (Dr. Conrad Bock, conrad.bock(at)nist.gov)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Actions in dynamically concurreny states in activity graphs need
some way to access the arguments provided by the concurrency
expression.  The Reference manual suggests the "implicit" event,
but does not define what that is (p 437).  Perhaps it is an the
action language issue.

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
February 5, 2000: received issue
March 5, 2002: moved from UML RTF to Action Semantics FTF
December 28, 2004: resolved by the UML 2 Superstructure FTF
March 9, 2005: closed issue
Discussion: 
[Action Semantics FTF]:
The dynamic concurrency model is being fixed in UML 2.0.
[UML 2 Superstructure FTF]:
Resolved in UML 2 by ExpansionRegion.
End of Annotations:=====
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2000 14:37:06 -0800
Message-Id: <200002052237.OAA05717@bones.intellicorp.com>
From: Conrad Bock <bock@intellicorp.com>
To: issues@omg.org
Subject: UML RTF 1.4 Issue: Dynamic concurrency arguments
Reply-to: bock@intellicorp.com
Content-Type: text
X-UIDL: Q^Wd9cHkd9oR?e9Z/2!!


Actions in dynamically concurreny states in activity graphs need
some way to access the arguments provided by the concurrency
expression.  The Reference manual suggests the "implicit" event,
but does not define what that is (p 437).  Perhaps it is an the
action language issue.