Issue 3323: Need clarification on custructor(s) for stream-based stubs/skeletons (java-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: In OMG IDL to Java Language Mapping spec, $1.21.51 "Stub/Skeleton Architecture" there are examples of stream- and DSI- based stubs/skeletons. These examples do not provide any constructors (this mean thay have only default ones). But, it seems that signatures of constructors should be clarified, because orb vendors have a freedom in defining these signatures. For example, the VisiBroker's 4.0 idl2java compiler generates stubs that have only default constructors, but in jdk 1.2 there stubs that have only constructors that take org.omg.CORBA.portable.Delegate as a single parameter. This leads to impossibility for generated stubs to extend the jdk 1.2 provided ones.
Resolution: closed, duplicate of issue 3707
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
February 11, 2000: received issue
October 23, 2000: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
From: "Gregory Kesler" <gkesler@inprise.com>
To: <java-rtf@omg.org>
Subject: Need clarification on custructor(s) for stream-based
stubs/skeletons
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 16:43:18 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_01BF74AF.19C31F60"
X-UIDL: Upm!!dlF!!;Q^!!["%e9

In OMG IDL to Java Language Mapping spec, $1.21.51 "Stub/Skeleton
Architecture" there are examples of stream- and DSI- based
stubs/skeletons. These examples do not provide any constructors (this
mean thay have only default ones). But, it seems that signatures of
constructors should be clarified, because orb vendors have a freedom
in defining these signatures. For example, the VisiBroker's 4.0
idl2java compiler generates stubs that have only default constructors,
but in jdk 1.2 there stubs that have only constructors that take
org.omg.CORBA.portable.Delegate as a single parameter. This leads to
impossibility for generated stubs to extend the jdk 1.2 provided ones.
 
Thanks. Gregory.

Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 13:21:58 -0400
From: Mary Leland <mleland@fpk.hp.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Java RTF <java-rtf@omg.org>, Juergen Boldt <juergen@omg.org>
Subject: Issue 3323 (IDL to Java RTF)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-UIDL: b9od9RU[!!f1~e9H!)!!

Juergen & RTF Members,

Can we close Issue 3323, since it is a duplicate of 3707?

Thanks,
-- Mary