Issue 3352: Python Issue: Object.create_request (python-ftf) Source: Camros Corporation (Mr. Jeffrey A. Marshall, jam@camros.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Section 14.4.4 describes the create_request method on CORBA.Object as taking: the operation name, parameters and the opt. keyword arguments context, flags and repository id. Later on in section 1.6 the signature for create_request is shown as: create_request (context, op_name, arg_list, result, flags) Which definition is correct? Also, shouldn't the name of this operation be "_create_request" to avoid name clashes with user-defined operations? Resolution: It should be spelled _created_request; this is an editorial change. Also, the definition of that ope Revised Text: Actions taken: February 22, 2000: received issue October 10, 2000: closed issue Discussion: It should be spelled _created_request; this is an editorial change. Also, the definition of that operation in 1.4.4 is correct, the definition in section 1.6 should be deleted. End of Annotations:===== Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 16:26:04 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200002222126.QAA24016@emerald.omg.org> To: python-ftf@omg.org, issues@omg.org Subject: Python Issue: Object.create_request From: "Jeffrey A. Marshall" X-Mailer: TWIG 2.1.1 Content-Type: text X-UIDL: 9QBe9oOF!!~1md9Ai!"! Section 14.4.4 describes the create_request method on CORBA.Object as taking: the operation name, parameters and the opt. keyword arguments context, flags and repository id. Later on in section 1.6 the signature for create_request is shown as: create_request (context, op_name, arg_list, result, flags) Which definition is correct? Also, shouldn't the name of this operation be "_create_request" to avoid name clashes with user-defined operations? -- Jeffrey A. Marshall Camros Corporation Email jam@camros.com Voice 703-876-1700 ext. 10 Fax 703-876-1818 http://www.camros.com/