Issue 3413: The NodeManager interface doesn't make sense (partyman-fac-rtf)
Source: Concept Five Technologies (Mr. Bill Swift, )
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: 1. The NodeManager interface doesn't make sense and should be eliminated
from the specification.
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
March 13, 2000: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 12:11:01 -0500
From: Bill Swift <bswift@concept5.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: juergen@omg.org
Subject: Party Management RTF Issues
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1;
boundary="------------ms64D4D3E02DE08004B64E3784"
X-UIDL: RP"!!;dj!!GMQe9>9Sd9

Juergen,

* I hope it is not too late for these Party Management RTF Issues *

Some of the following issues may have been raised by others.  I
suspect
we can weed out the redundancies as we review the final set of issues.
I am hoping that the issues I submitted during the first (non
conclusive) RTF are still available as issues for this second RTF.

These are additional issues.

1. The NodeManager interface doesn't make sense and should be
eliminated
from the specification