Issue 3416: Locator interface issue (partyman-fac-rtf)
Source: Concept Five Technologies (Mr. Bill Swift, )
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: 4. The Locator interface is geared toward queries based on an SQL like
syntax.  This is not necessarily receptive to LDAP searches.  An
additional method ­ or a signature modification - should be defined to
better suite a PMF that has been implemented using a hierarchical
structure such as LDAP.
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
March 13, 2000: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====


Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 12:11:01 -0500
From: Bill Swift <bswift@concept5.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: juergen@omg.org
Subject: Party Management RTF Issues
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1;
boundary="------------ms64D4D3E02DE08004B64E3784"
X-UIDL: RP"!!;dj!!GMQe9>9Sd9

Juergen,

* I hope it is not too late for these Party Management RTF Issues *

Some of the following issues may have been raised by others.  I
suspect
we can weed out the redundancies as we review the final set of issues.
I am hoping that the issues I submitted during the first (non
conclusive) RTF are still available as issues for this second RTF.

These are additional issues.4. The Locator interface is geared toward queries based on an SQL like
syntax.  This is not necessarily receptive to LDAP searches.  An
additional method - or a signature modification - should be defined to
better suite a PMF that has been implemented using a hierarchical
structure such as LDAP