Issue 3550: 2.2.10 the second paragraph is a bit confusing (biomolecular-ftf) Source: Japan Biological Informatics Consortium (Mr. Martin Senger, martin.senger@gmail.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: 2.2.10 the second paragraph is a bit confusing. If you read it slowly it may give you impression that run() is used for asynchonous invocation and wait() for synchronous. Suggestion: to replace the last sentence with: "If the client wants to be blocked waiting for the underlying BSA analysis tool to run to completion, it will invoke the run() method, followed immediately by the wait() method which will block the client until service execution completes." Resolution: accepted Revised Text: Change the last sentence of the second paragraph in section 2.2.10 ("If the BSA analysis tool ... client in the results.") to If the client wants to be blocked waiting for the underlying BSA analysis tool to run to completion, it will invoke the run() method, followed immediately by the wait() method which will block the client until service execution completes. Actions taken: April 11, 2000: received issue May 24, 2001: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 19:53:32 +0100 (GMT) From: Martin Senger To: Juergen Boldt cc: biomolecular-ftf@omg.org Subject: Re: several possible "issues" In-Reply-To: <38F2C7F5.518CB9A3@netgenics.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-UIDL: 2(#"!EOS!!7j5e9_~"e9 Juergen, Here are some issues we are discussing in the FTF. I think that they are ready to be issued as issues :-). Could you please do it? Most of them are just changes in the spec document and I do not know if they should be separated or sent together. I am refering to the lifesci/99-12-01. 2.2.10 the second paragraph is a bit confusing. If you read it slowly it may give you impression that run() is used for asynchonous invocation and wait() for synchronous. Suggestion: to replace the last sentence with: "If the client wants to be blocked waiting for the underlying BSA analysis tool to run to completion, it will invoke the run() method, followed immediately by the wait() method which will block the client until service execution completes." Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 20:21:40 -0700 From: Scott Markel Organization: NetGenics, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: BSA FTF Subject: [OMG-BSA] proposed resolutions for some issues Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-UIDL: W9!e9QLE!!'Okd9>SPe9 In accordance with the consensus at last week's FTF meeting, here are the proposed resolutions for the issues that were considered straightforward. Note that as some multi-issue issues are split apart, some of those may also fall into this category. I'm not reproducing the entire text of the individual issues. You can find that at http://cgi.omg.org/issues/biomolecular-ftf.html. Issues can be reported online at http://www.omg.org/technology/issuesform.htm. This message is *not* a vote. I just want to make sure these particular issues are as straightforward as some of us thought last week. Please let me know if you disagree. Actually it would be nice to know if you agree, too. :) If there's been no response by early next week (Philip is out until then), I'll send out a message kicking off a vote. If there are responses, hopefully we'll get the resolutions resolved and still vote on these issues next week. Scott Issue 3550: 2.2.10 the second paragraph is a bit confusing Resolution: Change the last sentence of the second paragraph in section 2.2.10 ("If the BSA analysis tool ... client in the results.") to If the client wants to be blocked waiting for the underlying BSA analysis tool to run to completion, it will invoke the run() method, followed immediately by the wait() method which will block the client until service execution completes.