Issue 3552: time stamps in section 2.2.9 (biomolecular-ftf) Source: Japan Biological Informatics Consortium (Mr. Martin Senger, martin.senger@gmail.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: About time stamps attributes (Execution performance information) in section 2.2.9: it is not clear if the current set of attributes is rich enough to provide the real "execution" information. Calling run() method is not necessary the same as starting an execution (considering some queueing sytem). Suggestion: to discuss and maybe to add an attribute keeping the "real" execution start; anyway the spec needs probably some clarification. Resolution: accepted Revised Text: Remove the word "performance" from the first paragraph in 2.2.9 (JobControl). Actions taken: April 11, 2000: received issue May 24, 2001: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 19:53:32 +0100 (GMT) From: Martin Senger To: Juergen Boldt cc: biomolecular-ftf@omg.org Subject: Re: several possible "issues" In-Reply-To: <38F2C7F5.518CB9A3@netgenics.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-UIDL: 2(#"!EOS!!7j5e9_~"e9 Juergen, Here are some issues we are discussing in the FTF. I think that they are ready to be issued as issues :-). Could you please do it? Most of them are just changes in the spec document and I do not know if they should be separated or sent together. I am refering to the lifesci/99-12-01. About time stamps attributes (Execution performance information) in section 2.2.9: it is not clear if the current set of attributes is rich enough to provide the real "execution" information. Calling run() method is not necessary the same as starting an execution (considering some queueing sytem). Suggestion: to discuss and maybe to add an attribute keeping the "real" execution start; anyway the spec needs probably some clarification. Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 14:21:10 +0100 (BST) From: Martin Senger To: biomolecular-ftf@omg.org Subject: issue 3552 - a proposed resolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-UIDL: k+S!!$nPd9Tjdd9'~Ud9 [ talking about execution time stamps ] Because there was little support for having an additional time stamp indicating the real start of an analysis, I am proposing just a textual change (no change in IDL): Proposed resulution ------------------- To remove word "performance" from the first paragraph in 2.2.9 (JobControl). Regards, Martin -- Martin Senger EMBL Outstation - Hinxton Senger@EBI.ac.uk European Bioinformatics Institute Phone: (+44) 1223 494636 Wellcome Trust Genome Campus (Switchboard: 494444) Hinxton Fax : (+44) 1223 494468 Cambridge CB10 1SD United Kingdom http://industry.ebi.ac.uk/~senger Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 10:58:06 -0700 From: Scott Markel Organization: NetGenics, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Senger CC: biomolecular-ftf@omg.org Subject: Re: issue 3552 - a proposed resolution References: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-UIDL: %$%e9ZKAe9Sd%e9nkZd9 Martin, Martin Senger wrote: > > [ talking about execution time stamps ] > > Because there was little support for having an additional time stamp > indicating the real start of an analysis, I am proposing just a textual > change (no change in IDL): > > Proposed resulution > ------------------- > To remove word "performance" from the first paragraph in 2.2.9 > (JobControl). That's a good suggestion. I like how the sentence reads without it. Scott -- Scott Markel, Ph.D. NetGenics, Inc. smarkel@netgenics.com 4350 Executive Drive Tel: 858 455 5223 Suite 260 FAX: 858 455 1388 San Diego, CA 92121