Issue 3623: Issue 1 -- resulting from Japanese comment JPN-009E: (interop) Source: Object Management Group (Mr. Henry Lowe, ) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: The Japanese would like to clarify the first sentence of the first paragraph of section 15.5.2, page 15-46, of CORBA 2.3.1 (this is clause 6.4.2 of DIS 19500-2, page 70) by adding the phrase "if Bi-Directional GIOP is not used" to the end of the sentence. The resulting sentence would read "Only the client (connection originator) may send Request, LocateRequest, and CancelRequest messages if Bi-Directional GIOP is not used." Is there any reason not to add this phrase now that Bi-Directional is in the OMG specification? Resolution: Agree that this was an editorial oversight in corba 2.3. Revised Text: Change the first paragraph of 15.5.2 from: " Only the client (connection originator) may send Request, LocateRequest, and CancelRequest messages. Connections are not fully symmetrical. " to " Only the client (connection originator) may send Request, LocateRequest, and CancelRequest messages, if Bi-Directional GIOP is not in use. " Actions taken: May 19, 2000: received issue February 27, 2001: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== X-Sender: hlowe@emerald.omg.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 16:00:17 -0400 To: juergen, issues From: Henry Lowe Subject: Two Interop issues from ISO Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-UIDL: >3!e9"KFe9^Z7e9jP*e9 As a result of submitting chapters 13 and 15 to ISO using PAS (it is ISO/IEC DIS 19500-2), some problems were found by the ISO reviewers. Most were minor editorial and will just be fixed. However, the following two should become Interop issues, so they can be fixed for both the ISO standard and the OMG spec. I am submitting them as chair of the Liaison Subcommittee. Henry ---------------------------------------------------- Note for the following issues: the comments on DIS 19500-2 are on the OMG site as pas/00-04-01 and the original PAS submission is pas/99-08-02 on the OMG server. Issue 1 -- resulting from Japanese comment JPN-009E: The Japanese would like to clarify the first sentence of the first paragraph of section 15.5.2, page 15-46, of CORBA 2.3.1 (this is clause 6.4.2 of DIS 19500-2, page 70) by adding the phrase "if Bi-Directional GIOP is not used" to the end of the sentence. The resulting sentence would read "Only the client (connection originator) may send Request, LocateRequest, and CancelRequest messages if Bi-Directional GIOP is not used." Is there any reason not to add this phrase now that Bi-Directional is in the OMG specification?